Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLNCX vs RSLDX
GLNCX vs RSLDX Comparison
Open Charts GLNCX vs RSLDX
MFS Global New Discovery C
Price$21.77
Change+$0.20 (+0.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets69.83M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R5E
Price$77.66
Change+$1.47 (+1.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets82.43B
GLNCX vs RSLDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLNCX vs. RSLDX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLNCX is a StrongBuy and RSLDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLDX has more cash in the bank: 82.4B vs. GLNCX (69.8M). RSLDX pays higher dividends than GLNCX: RSLDX (0.88) vs GLNCX (0.00). GLNCX was incepted earlier than RSLDX: GLNCX (14 years) vs RSLDX (10 years). GLNCX (2.51) is less costly to investors than RSLDX (0.80). GLNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. RSLDX (41.00). RSLDX has a lower initial minimum investment than GLNCX: RSLDX (250) vs GLNCX (1000). RSLDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.62 vs. GLNCX (7.24). GLNCX return over 5 years is better than : -2.11 vs. RSLDX (-6.36).
| GLNCX | RSLDX | GLNCX / RSLDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 0.80 | 263% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.51 | 0.80 | 314% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.412 | 4.804 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 69.8M | 82.4B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.88 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.24 | 13.62 | 53% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.44 | 25.33 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.11 | -6.36 | 33% |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.24 | 107.93 | 63% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement