Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLNCX vs RSLBX
GLNCX vs RSLBX Comparison
Open Charts GLNCX vs RSLBX
MFS Global New Discovery C
Price$21.77
Change+$0.04 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets73.43M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2
Price$63.98
Change+$0.03 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets82.43B
GLNCX vs RSLBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLNCX vs. RSLBX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLNCX is a Hold and RSLBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLBX has more cash in the bank: 82.4B vs. GLNCX (73.4M). RSLBX pays higher dividends than GLNCX: RSLBX (0.20) vs GLNCX (0.00). GLNCX was incepted earlier than RSLBX: GLNCX (14 years) vs RSLBX (24 years). GLNCX (2.56) is less costly to investors than RSLBX (1.74). RSLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GLNCX: RSLBX (250) vs GLNCX (1000). RSLBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.89 vs. GLNCX (10.56). GLNCX return over 5 years is better than : -1.27 vs. RSLBX (-10.14).
| GLNCX | RSLBX | GLNCX / RSLBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 1.74 | 121% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.56 | 1.74 | 147% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.412 | 4.185 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 73.4M | 82.4B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.20 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.56 | 13.89 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.72 | 25.85 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.27 | -10.14 | 13% |
| Returns for 10 years | 67.46 | 78.84 | 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers