Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLNCX vs RSLBX
GLNCX vs RSLBX Comparison
Open Charts GLNCX vs RSLBX
MFS Global New Discovery C
Price$21.77
Change+$0.20 (+0.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets69.83M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2
Price$64.30
Change+$0.97 (+1.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets82.43B
GLNCX vs RSLBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLNCX vs. RSLBX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLNCX is a StrongBuy and RSLBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLBX has more cash in the bank: 82.4B vs. GLNCX (69.8M). RSLBX pays higher dividends than GLNCX: RSLBX (0.19) vs GLNCX (0.00). GLNCX was incepted earlier than RSLBX: GLNCX (14 years) vs RSLBX (24 years). GLNCX (2.51) is less costly to investors than RSLBX (1.74). GLNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. RSLBX (41.00). RSLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GLNCX: RSLBX (250) vs GLNCX (1000). RSLBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.64 vs. GLNCX (7.24). GLNCX return over 5 years is better than : -2.11 vs. RSLBX (-12.64).
| GLNCX | RSLBX | GLNCX / RSLBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 1.74 | 121% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.51 | 1.74 | 144% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.412 | 4.706 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 69.8M | 82.4B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.19 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.24 | 11.64 | 62% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.44 | 20.82 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.11 | -12.64 | 17% |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.24 | 82.58 | 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement