Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLNCX vs RSEBX
GLNCX vs RSEBX Comparison
Open Charts GLNCX vs RSEBX
MFS Global New Discovery C
Price$21.52
Change+$0.15 (+0.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.18M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2E
Price$73.87
Change+$0.39 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets82.31B
GLNCX vs RSEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLNCX vs. RSEBX commentary
Dec 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLNCX is a Buy and RSEBX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSEBX has more cash in the bank: 82.3B vs. GLNCX (71.2M). RSEBX pays higher dividends than GLNCX: RSEBX (0.22) vs GLNCX (0.00). GLNCX was incepted earlier than RSEBX: GLNCX (14 years) vs RSEBX (11 years). GLNCX (2.56) is less costly to investors than RSEBX (1.45). GLNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. RSEBX (32.00). RSEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GLNCX: RSEBX (250) vs GLNCX (1000). RSEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.20 vs. GLNCX (1.99). RSEBX return over 5 years is better than : 0.09 vs. GLNCX (-2.27).
| GLNCX | RSEBX | GLNCX / RSEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 1.45 | 145% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.56 | 1.45 | 177% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.468 | 13.634 | 62% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 71.2M | 82.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.22 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.99 | 6.20 | 32% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.11 | 32.64 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.27 | 0.09 | -2,624% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.38 | 58.80 | 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement