Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLNBX vs SFCWX
GLNBX vs SFCWX Comparison
Open Charts GLNBX vs SFCWX
MFS Global New Discovery B
Price$21.23
Change-$0.21 (-0.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets69.76M
American Funds SMALLCAP World F3
Price$75.93
Change-$1.39 (-1.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets81.78B
GLNBX vs SFCWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLNBX vs. SFCWX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLNBX is a StrongBuy and SFCWX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SFCWX has more cash in the bank: 81.8B vs. GLNBX (69.8M). SFCWX pays higher dividends than GLNBX: SFCWX (0.90) vs GLNBX (0.00). GLNBX was incepted earlier than SFCWX: GLNBX (14 years) vs SFCWX (9 years). GLNBX (2.56) is less costly to investors than SFCWX (0.65). GLNBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. SFCWX (32.00). GLNBX has a lower initial minimum investment than SFCWX: GLNBX (1000) vs SFCWX (1000000). SFCWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.88 vs. GLNBX (3.28). SFCWX return over 5 years is better than : 9.26 vs. GLNBX (1.23).
| GLNBX | SFCWX | GLNBX / SFCWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 0.65 | 323% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.56 | 0.65 | 394% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.065 | 12.305 | 66% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 69.8M | 81.8B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.90 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.28 | 7.88 | 42% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.16 | 32.00 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.23 | 9.26 | 13% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.84 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement