Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLNBX vs RSLFX
GLNBX vs RSLFX Comparison
Open Charts GLNBX vs RSLFX
MFS Global New Discovery B
Price$21.77
Change+$0.20 (+0.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets68.77M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R5
Price$80.91
Change+$1.64 (+2.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets82.43B
GLNBX vs RSLFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLNBX vs. RSLFX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLNBX is a StrongBuy and RSLFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLFX has more cash in the bank: 82.4B vs. GLNBX (68.8M). RSLFX pays higher dividends than GLNBX: RSLFX (0.92) vs GLNBX (0.00). GLNBX was incepted earlier than RSLFX: GLNBX (14 years) vs RSLFX (24 years). GLNBX (2.51) is less costly to investors than RSLFX (0.70). GLNBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. RSLFX (41.00). RSLFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GLNBX: RSLFX (250) vs GLNBX (1000). RSLFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.90 vs. GLNBX (7.24). GLNBX return over 5 years is better than : -2.11 vs. RSLFX (-5.53).
| GLNBX | RSLFX | GLNBX / RSLFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 0.70 | 300% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.51 | 0.70 | 359% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.412 | 4.792 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 68.8M | 82.4B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.92 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.24 | 13.90 | 52% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.44 | 25.87 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.11 | -5.53 | 38% |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.24 | 112.27 | 61% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement