Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLNBX vs RSLBX
GLNBX vs RSLBX Comparison
Open Charts GLNBX vs RSLBX
MFS Global New Discovery B
Price$21.42
Change+$0.15 (+0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets69.92M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2
Price$63.48
Change+$0.68 (+1.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets80.92B
GLNBX vs RSLBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLNBX vs. RSLBX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLNBX is a Hold and RSLBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLBX has more cash in the bank: 80.9B vs. GLNBX (69.9M). RSLBX pays higher dividends than GLNBX: RSLBX (0.06) vs GLNBX (0.00). GLNBX was incepted earlier than RSLBX: GLNBX (14 years) vs RSLBX (23 years). GLNBX (2.56) is less costly to investors than RSLBX (1.75). GLNBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. RSLBX (32.00). RSLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GLNBX: RSLBX (250) vs GLNBX (1000). RSLBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.63 vs. GLNBX (2.36). RSLBX return over 5 years is better than : 2.75 vs. GLNBX (2.11).
| GLNBX | RSLBX | GLNBX / RSLBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 1.75 | 120% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.56 | 1.75 | 146% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.208 | 10.182 | 71% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 69.9M | 80.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.06 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.36 | 5.63 | 42% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.02 | 37.92 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.11 | 2.75 | 77% |
| Returns for 10 years | 47.71 | 45.45 | 105% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement