Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLNBX vs RSLAX
GLNBX vs RSLAX Comparison
Open Charts GLNBX vs RSLAX
MFS Global New Discovery B
Price$21.71
Change+$0.10 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.18M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R1
Price$62.54
Change+$0.23 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets80.43B
GLNBX vs RSLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLNBX vs. RSLAX commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLNBX is a Hold and RSLAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLAX has more cash in the bank: 80.4B vs. GLNBX (71.2M). RSLAX pays higher dividends than GLNBX: RSLAX (0.11) vs GLNBX (0.00). GLNBX was incepted earlier than RSLAX: GLNBX (14 years) vs RSLAX (23 years). GLNBX (2.56) is less costly to investors than RSLAX (1.74). GLNBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. RSLAX (32.00). RSLAX has a lower initial minimum investment than GLNBX: RSLAX (250) vs GLNBX (1000). RSLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.02 vs. GLNBX (3.23). RSLAX (10.42) and GLNBX (10.26) have equivalent 5 years return.
| GLNBX | RSLAX | GLNBX / RSLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 1.74 | 121% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.56 | 1.74 | 147% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.425 | 10.111 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 71.2M | 80.4B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.11 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.23 | 5.02 | 64% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.50 | 42.37 | 114% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.26 | 10.42 | 98% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.52 | 53.12 | 112% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers