Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLNAX vs SFCWX
GLNAX vs SFCWX Comparison
Open Charts GLNAX vs SFCWX
MFS Global New Discovery A
Price$24.52
Change+$0.09 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets76.42M
American Funds SMALLCAP World F3
Price$74.91
Change+$0.44 (+0.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets79.12B
GLNAX vs SFCWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLNAX vs. SFCWX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLNAX is a Buy and SFCWX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SFCWX has more cash in the bank: 79.1B vs. GLNAX (76.4M). SFCWX pays higher dividends than GLNAX: SFCWX (0.94) vs GLNAX (0.31). GLNAX was incepted earlier than SFCWX: GLNAX (14 years) vs SFCWX (8 years). GLNAX (1.81) is less costly to investors than SFCWX (0.65). GLNAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. SFCWX (32.00). GLNAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SFCWX: GLNAX (1000) vs SFCWX (1000000). GLNAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.50 vs. SFCWX (10.80). GLNAX return over 5 years is better than : 25.21 vs. SFCWX (23.80).
| GLNAX | SFCWX | GLNAX / SFCWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.65 | 208% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.65 | 278% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.600 | 8.805 | 120% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 76.4M | 79.1B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.31 | 0.94 | 34% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.50 | 10.80 | 116% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.46 | 36.16 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.21 | 23.80 | 106% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.40 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement