Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLNAX vs SFCWX
GLNAX vs SFCWX Comparison
Open Charts GLNAX vs SFCWX
MFS Global New Discovery A
Price$24.05
Change+$0.17 (+0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.67M
American Funds SMALLCAP World F3
Price$77.84
Change-$0.21 (-0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets83.25B
GLNAX vs SFCWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLNAX vs. SFCWX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLNAX is a Buy and SFCWX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SFCWX has more cash in the bank: 83.3B vs. GLNAX (70.7M). SFCWX pays higher dividends than GLNAX: SFCWX (0.88) vs GLNAX (0.32). GLNAX was incepted earlier than SFCWX: GLNAX (14 years) vs SFCWX (9 years). GLNAX (1.81) is less costly to investors than SFCWX (0.65). GLNAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. SFCWX (32.00). GLNAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SFCWX: GLNAX (1000) vs SFCWX (1000000). SFCWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.00 vs. GLNAX (2.01). SFCWX return over 5 years is better than : 4.29 vs. GLNAX (1.66).
| GLNAX | SFCWX | GLNAX / SFCWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.65 | 208% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.65 | 278% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.894 | 13.366 | 59% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 70.7M | 83.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.32 | 0.88 | 36% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.01 | 7.00 | 29% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.80 | 31.42 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.66 | 4.29 | 39% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.90 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement