Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLNAX vs SCWFX
GLNAX vs SCWFX Comparison
Open Charts GLNAX vs SCWFX
MFS Global New Discovery A
Price$24.49
Change+$0.05 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets73.43M
American Funds SMALLCAP World F1
Price$75.07
Change+$0.03 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets82.43B
GLNAX vs SCWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLNAX vs. SCWFX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLNAX is a Hold and SCWFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCWFX has more cash in the bank: 82.4B vs. GLNAX (73.4M). SCWFX pays higher dividends than GLNAX: SCWFX (0.67) vs GLNAX (0.37). GLNAX was incepted earlier than SCWFX: GLNAX (14 years) vs SCWFX (25 years). GLNAX (1.81) is less costly to investors than SCWFX (1.07). SCWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GLNAX: SCWFX (250) vs GLNAX (1000). SCWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.45 vs. GLNAX (11.73). GLNAX return over 5 years is better than : 3.38 vs. SCWFX (-5.12).
| GLNAX | SCWFX | GLNAX / SCWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.07 | 126% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 1.07 | 169% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.480 | 4.206 | 107% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 73.4M | 82.4B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.37 | 0.67 | 56% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.73 | 15.45 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.85 | 29.30 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.38 | -5.12 | -66% |
| Returns for 10 years | 84.24 | 98.49 | 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers