Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLNAX vs RSLBX
GLNAX vs RSLBX Comparison
Open Charts GLNAX vs RSLBX
MFS Global New Discovery A
Price$24.49
Change+$0.25 (+1.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets68.77M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2
Price$64.30
Change+$0.97 (+1.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets82.43B
GLNAX vs RSLBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLNAX vs. RSLBX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLNAX is a StrongBuy and RSLBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLBX has more cash in the bank: 82.4B vs. GLNAX (68.8M). GLNAX pays higher dividends than RSLBX: GLNAX (0.36) vs RSLBX (0.19). GLNAX was incepted earlier than RSLBX: GLNAX (14 years) vs RSLBX (24 years). GLNAX (1.76) and RSLBX (1.74) have similar cost to investors . GLNAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. RSLBX (41.00). RSLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GLNAX: RSLBX (250) vs GLNAX (1000). RSLBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.64 vs. GLNAX (8.29). GLNAX return over 5 years is better than : 2.43 vs. RSLBX (-12.64).
| GLNAX | RSLBX | GLNAX / RSLBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.74 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.76 | 1.74 | 101% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.480 | 4.706 | 95% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 68.8M | 82.4B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.36 | 0.19 | 186% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.29 | 11.64 | 71% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.45 | 20.82 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.43 | -12.64 | -19% |
| Returns for 10 years | 85.20 | 82.58 | 103% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement