Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLNAX vs RSEBX
GLNAX vs RSEBX Comparison
Open Charts GLNAX vs RSEBX
MFS Global New Discovery A
Price$24.49
Change+$0.25 (+1.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets68.77M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2E
Price$73.91
Change+$1.51 (+2.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets82.43B
GLNAX vs RSEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLNAX vs. RSEBX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLNAX is a StrongBuy and RSEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSEBX has more cash in the bank: 82.4B vs. GLNAX (68.8M). GLNAX pays higher dividends than RSEBX: GLNAX (0.36) vs RSEBX (0.34). GLNAX was incepted earlier than RSEBX: GLNAX (14 years) vs RSEBX (11 years). GLNAX (1.76) is less costly to investors than RSEBX (1.45). GLNAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. RSEBX (41.00). RSEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GLNAX: RSEBX (250) vs GLNAX (1000). RSEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.65 vs. GLNAX (8.29). GLNAX return over 5 years is better than : 2.43 vs. RSEBX (-9.71).
| GLNAX | RSEBX | GLNAX / RSEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.45 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.76 | 1.45 | 121% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.480 | 4.733 | 95% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 68.8M | 82.4B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.36 | 0.34 | 106% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.29 | 12.65 | 66% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.45 | 22.63 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.43 | -9.71 | -25% |
| Returns for 10 years | 85.20 | 94.72 | 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement