Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLNAX vs RSEBX
GLNAX vs RSEBX Comparison
Open Charts GLNAX vs RSEBX
MFS Global New Discovery A
Price$23.90
Change-$0.05 (-0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets69.92M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2E
Price$71.80
Change-$0.15 (-0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets81.1B
GLNAX vs RSEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLNAX vs. RSEBX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLNAX is a Hold and RSEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSEBX has more cash in the bank: 81.1B vs. GLNAX (69.9M). GLNAX pays higher dividends than RSEBX: GLNAX (0.31) vs RSEBX (0.23). GLNAX was incepted earlier than RSEBX: GLNAX (14 years) vs RSEBX (11 years). GLNAX (1.81) is less costly to investors than RSEBX (1.45). GLNAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. RSEBX (32.00). RSEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GLNAX: RSEBX (250) vs GLNAX (1000). RSEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.94 vs. GLNAX (3.10). GLNAX return over 5 years is better than : 6.92 vs. RSEBX (5.76).
| GLNAX | RSEBX | GLNAX / RSEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.45 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 1.45 | 125% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.803 | 10.450 | 75% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 69.9M | 81.1B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.31 | 0.23 | 138% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.10 | 5.94 | 52% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.16 | 39.16 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.92 | 5.76 | 120% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.99 | 55.08 | 113% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers