GLGDF
Price
$1.44
Change
-$0.08 (-5.26%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
298.17M
39 days until earnings call
STPGF
Price
$0.89
Change
-$0.04 (-4.30%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
61.14M
Interact to see
Advertisement

GLGDF vs STPGF

Header iconGLGDF vs STPGF Comparison
Open Charts GLGDF vs STPGFBanner chart's image
GoGold Resources
Price$1.44
Change-$0.08 (-5.26%)
Volume$368.93K
Capitalization298.17M
Steppe Gold
Price$0.89
Change-$0.04 (-4.30%)
Volume$14.75K
Capitalization61.14M
GLGDF vs STPGF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GLGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
STPGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GLGDF vs. STPGF commentary
Jun 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLGDF is a Hold and STPGF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 29, 2025
Stock price -- (GLGDF: $1.44 vs. STPGF: $0.89)
Brand notoriety: GLGDF and STPGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GLGDF: 205% vs. STPGF: 27%
Market capitalization -- GLGDF: $298.17M vs. STPGF: $61.14M
GLGDF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $298.17M. STPGF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $61.14M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GLGDF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSTPGF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GLGDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • STPGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, STPGF is a better buy in the long-term than GLGDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GLGDF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while STPGF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GLGDF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • STPGF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GLGDF is a better buy in the short-term than STPGF.

Price Growth

GLGDF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -8.47% price change this week, while STPGF (@Precious Metals) price change was -7.55% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.26%.

Reported Earning Dates

GLGDF is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+0.06% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLGDF($298M) has a higher market cap than STPGF($61.1M). GLGDF has higher P/E ratio than STPGF: GLGDF (769.23) vs STPGF (1.90). STPGF YTD gains are higher at: 107.130 vs. GLGDF (87.843). STPGF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 30M vs. GLGDF (-3.76M). GLGDF has more cash in the bank: 88.8M vs. STPGF (2.07M). GLGDF has less debt than STPGF: GLGDF (778K) vs STPGF (12.2M). STPGF has higher revenues than GLGDF: STPGF (66.4M) vs GLGDF (28.6M).
GLGDFSTPGFGLGDF / STPGF
Capitalization298M61.1M488%
EBITDA-3.76M30M-13%
Gain YTD87.843107.13082%
P/E Ratio769.231.9040,585%
Revenue28.6M66.4M43%
Total Cash88.8M2.07M4,290%
Total Debt778K12.2M6%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GLGDF vs STPGF: Fundamental Ratings
GLGDF
STPGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5075
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
89
Overvalued
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
70100
SMR RATING
1..100
8917
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3935
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6871
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

STPGF's Valuation (50) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GLGDF (89). This means that STPGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GLGDF’s over the last 12 months.

GLGDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (70) in the null industry is in the same range as STPGF (100). This means that GLGDF’s stock grew similarly to STPGF’s over the last 12 months.

STPGF's SMR Rating (17) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GLGDF (89). This means that STPGF’s stock grew significantly faster than GLGDF’s over the last 12 months.

STPGF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as GLGDF (39). This means that STPGF’s stock grew similarly to GLGDF’s over the last 12 months.

GLGDF's P/E Growth Rating (68) in the null industry is in the same range as STPGF (71). This means that GLGDF’s stock grew similarly to STPGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GLGDFSTPGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
82%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GLGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
STPGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MSBHF19.970.43
+2.20%
Mitsubishi Corp.
BLHEF227.98N/A
N/A
Baloise Holdings AG
MTAGF2.70N/A
N/A
Ceconomy AG
NODB54.50N/A
N/A
North Dallas Bank & Trust Co. (TX)
CYMHF0.13N/A
-1.82%
Cymat Technologies Ltd.

GLGDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GLGDF has been loosely correlated with SSVFF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GLGDF jumps, then SSVFF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GLGDF
1D Price
Change %
GLGDF100%
-5.46%
SSVFF - GLGDF
42%
Loosely correlated
-3.36%
ISVLF - GLGDF
35%
Loosely correlated
-4.54%
DSVSF - GLGDF
32%
Poorly correlated
-7.02%
MAIFF - GLGDF
30%
Poorly correlated
+4.14%
STPGF - GLGDF
28%
Poorly correlated
-4.11%
More

STPGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that STPGF and GLGDF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that STPGF and GLGDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To STPGF
1D Price
Change %
STPGF100%
-4.11%
GLGDF - STPGF
28%
Poorly correlated
-5.46%
SAPLF - STPGF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.52%
WHGOF - STPGF
21%
Poorly correlated
-8.00%
CNRIF - STPGF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
STBMF - STPGF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More