GLGDF
Price
$1.44
Change
-$0.08 (-5.26%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
298.17M
39 days until earnings call
HBEIF
Price
$0.09
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
3.71M
Interact to see
Advertisement

GLGDF vs HBEIF

Header iconGLGDF vs HBEIF Comparison
Open Charts GLGDF vs HBEIFBanner chart's image
GoGold Resources
Price$1.44
Change-$0.08 (-5.26%)
Volume$368.93K
Capitalization298.17M
Honey Badger Silver
Price$0.09
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$400
Capitalization3.71M
GLGDF vs HBEIF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GLGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HBEIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GLGDF vs. HBEIF commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLGDF is a Hold and HBEIF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (GLGDF: $1.44 vs. HBEIF: $0.09)
Brand notoriety: GLGDF and HBEIF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GLGDF: 205% vs. HBEIF: 0%
Market capitalization -- GLGDF: $298.17M vs. HBEIF: $3.71M
GLGDF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $298.17M. HBEIF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $3.71M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GLGDF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHBEIF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GLGDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • HBEIF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both GLGDF and HBEIF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GLGDF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HBEIF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GLGDF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HBEIF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HBEIF is a better buy in the short-term than GLGDF.

Price Growth

GLGDF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -8.47% price change this week, while HBEIF (@Precious Metals) price change was +6.61% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.26%.

Reported Earning Dates

GLGDF is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+0.06% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLGDF($298M) has a higher market cap than HBEIF($3.71M). GLGDF YTD gains are higher at: 87.843 vs. HBEIF (15.645). HBEIF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -2.34M vs. GLGDF (-3.76M). GLGDF has higher revenues than HBEIF: GLGDF (28.6M) vs HBEIF (0).
GLGDFHBEIFGLGDF / HBEIF
Capitalization298M3.71M8,035%
EBITDA-3.76M-2.34M161%
Gain YTD87.84315.645561%
P/E Ratio769.23N/A-
Revenue28.6M0-
Total Cash88.8MN/A-
Total Debt778KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GLGDF vs HBEIF: Fundamental Ratings
GLGDF
HBEIF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5046
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
89
Overvalued
89
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7097
SMR RATING
1..100
89100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3943
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
68100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GLGDF's Valuation (89) in the null industry is in the same range as HBEIF (89). This means that GLGDF’s stock grew similarly to HBEIF’s over the last 12 months.

GLGDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (70) in the null industry is in the same range as HBEIF (97). This means that GLGDF’s stock grew similarly to HBEIF’s over the last 12 months.

GLGDF's SMR Rating (89) in the null industry is in the same range as HBEIF (100). This means that GLGDF’s stock grew similarly to HBEIF’s over the last 12 months.

GLGDF's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as HBEIF (43). This means that GLGDF’s stock grew similarly to HBEIF’s over the last 12 months.

GLGDF's P/E Growth Rating (68) in the null industry is in the same range as HBEIF (100). This means that GLGDF’s stock grew similarly to HBEIF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GLGDFHBEIF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GLGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HBEIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WMMAX15.340.11
+0.72%
TETON Westwood Mighty Mites A
NRAEX51.430.36
+0.70%
Neuberger Berman Sustainable Equity E
FNKIX17.720.09
+0.51%
Frank Value Instl
BPTIX204.43-0.21
-0.10%
Baron Partners Institutional
DLHIX23.42-0.05
-0.21%
Macquarie Healthcare I

GLGDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GLGDF has been loosely correlated with SSVFF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GLGDF jumps, then SSVFF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GLGDF
1D Price
Change %
GLGDF100%
-5.46%
SSVFF - GLGDF
42%
Loosely correlated
-3.36%
ISVLF - GLGDF
35%
Loosely correlated
-4.54%
DSVSF - GLGDF
32%
Poorly correlated
-7.02%
MAIFF - GLGDF
30%
Poorly correlated
+4.14%
STPGF - GLGDF
28%
Poorly correlated
-4.11%
More

HBEIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HBEIF and APGOF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HBEIF and APGOF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HBEIF
1D Price
Change %
HBEIF100%
-4.11%
APGOF - HBEIF
23%
Poorly correlated
-4.24%
STLRF - HBEIF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.31%
TDRRF - HBEIF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.67%
GLGDF - HBEIF
22%
Poorly correlated
-5.46%
RUPRF - HBEIF
21%
Poorly correlated
-3.86%
More