Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLFOX vs NMFIX
GLFOX vs NMFIX Comparison
Open Charts GLFOX vs NMFIX
Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Open
Price$18.35
Change-$0.01 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.1B
Northern Multi-Mgr Glbl Listed Infra
Price$14.15
Change-$0.04 (-0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets975.91M
GLFOX vs NMFIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLFOX vs. NMFIX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLFOX is a Buy and NMFIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLFOX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. NMFIX (976M). NMFIX (2.45) and GLFOX (2.40) have matching dividends . GLFOX was incepted earlier than NMFIX: GLFOX (16 years) vs NMFIX (13 years). GLFOX (1.22) is less costly to investors than NMFIX (1.03). NMFIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.72 vs. GLFOX (36.00). GLFOX (2500) and NMFIX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. NMFIX (16.01) and GLFOX (15.65) have marching annual gain over last year. GLFOX return over 5 years is better than : 46.11 vs. NMFIX (27.04).
| GLFOX | NMFIX | GLFOX / NMFIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.98 | 124% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.03 | 118% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.510 | 23.339 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 976M | 1,137% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.40 | 2.45 | 98% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.65 | 16.01 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.69 | 27.56 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.11 | 27.04 | 170% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.38 | 63.64 | 100% |