Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLFOX vs NMFIX
GLFOX vs NMFIX Comparison
Open Charts GLFOX vs NMFIX
Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Open
Price$18.22
Change-$0.06 (-0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.02B
Northern Multi-Mgr Glbl Listed Infra
Price$14.09
Change-$0.09 (-0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets959.98M
GLFOX vs NMFIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLFOX vs. NMFIX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLFOX is a StrongBuy and NMFIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLFOX has more cash in the bank: 11B vs. NMFIX (960M). NMFIX (2.53) and GLFOX (2.47) have matching dividends . GLFOX was incepted earlier than NMFIX: GLFOX (16 years) vs NMFIX (13 years). GLFOX (1.22) is less costly to investors than NMFIX (1.03). NMFIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.72 vs. GLFOX (36.00). GLFOX (2500) and NMFIX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. GLFOX (18.64) and NMFIX (18.47) have marching annual gain over last year. GLFOX return over 5 years is better than : 43.54 vs. NMFIX (27.05).
| GLFOX | NMFIX | GLFOX / NMFIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.98 | 124% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.03 | 118% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.989 | 23.252 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11B | 960M | 1,146% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.47 | 2.53 | 98% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.64 | 18.47 | 101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.89 | 31.84 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.54 | 27.05 | 161% |
| Returns for 10 years | 65.42 | 63.53 | 103% |