Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLFOX vs NMFIX
GLFOX vs NMFIX Comparison
Open Charts GLFOX vs NMFIX
Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Open
Price$17.91
Change+$0.04 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.19B
Northern Multi-Mgr Glbl Listed Infra
Price$13.51
Change+$0.01 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets904.45M
GLFOX vs NMFIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLFOX vs. NMFIX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLFOX is a Buy and NMFIX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLFOX has more cash in the bank: 10.2B vs. NMFIX (904M). NMFIX (2.54) and GLFOX (2.49) have matching dividends . GLFOX was incepted earlier than NMFIX: GLFOX (16 years) vs NMFIX (13 years). GLFOX (1.22) is less costly to investors than NMFIX (1.04). NMFIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.35 vs. GLFOX (36.00). GLFOX (2500) and NMFIX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. GLFOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.36 vs. NMFIX (18.14). GLFOX return over 5 years is better than : 45.96 vs. NMFIX (30.74).
| GLFOX | NMFIX | GLFOX / NMFIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.99 | 123% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.04 | 117% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.360 | 16.734 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.2B | 904M | 1,128% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.49 | 2.54 | 98% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.36 | 18.14 | 118% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.96 | 23.01 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.96 | 30.74 | 149% |
| Returns for 10 years | 65.41 | 48.14 | 136% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement