GLFGF
Price
$0.40
Change
+$0.18 (+81.82%)
Updated
Jul 30 closing price
Capitalization
86.95M
LULU
Price
$167.80
Change
-$38.29 (-18.58%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
19.9B
88 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

GLFGF vs LULU

Header iconGLFGF vs LULU Comparison
Open Charts GLFGF vs LULUBanner chart's image
GLOBAL FASHION GROUP SA
Price$0.40
Change+$0.18 (+81.82%)
Volume$142.8K
Capitalization86.95M
lululemon athletica
Price$167.80
Change-$38.29 (-18.58%)
Volume$36.79M
Capitalization19.9B
GLFGF vs LULU Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GLFGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LULU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GLFGF vs. LULU commentary
Sep 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLFGF is a Hold and LULU is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 07, 2025
Stock price -- (GLFGF: $0.40 vs. LULU: $167.80)
Brand notoriety: GLFGF: Not notable vs. LULU: Notable
Both companies represent the Apparel/Footwear Retail industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GLFGF: 170% vs. LULU: 859%
Market capitalization -- GLFGF: $86.95M vs. LULU: $19.9B
GLFGF [@Apparel/Footwear Retail] is valued at $86.95M. LULU’s [@Apparel/Footwear Retail] market capitalization is $19.9B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Apparel/Footwear Retail] industry ranges from $154.99B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Apparel/Footwear Retail] industry is $14.54B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GLFGF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLULU’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GLFGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LULU’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GLFGF is a better buy in the long-term than LULU.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GLFGF’s TA Score shows that 0 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LULU’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GLFGF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • LULU’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GLFGF is a better buy in the short-term than LULU.

Price Growth

GLFGF (@Apparel/Footwear Retail) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while LULU (@Apparel/Footwear Retail) price change was -17.01% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Apparel/Footwear Retail industry was +1.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.48%.

Reported Earning Dates

LULU is expected to report earnings on Dec 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Apparel/Footwear Retail (+1.63% weekly)

Companies in the apparel and/or footwear retail industry sell clothing, accessories and footwear, for different age groups and genders. The industry’s product categories could range from basics, such as underwear, to luxury items. Some retailers source items from wholesalers or an apparel brand to sell in their stores; some others are licensed to make and market their own retail goods under particular brands. Several companies outsource production of clothing to developing/emerging economies where labor costs are relatively inexpensive. Apparel retail is often influenced by fashion trends, and many companies feel the need to adapt to what’s “in vogue” to retain customers and attract new ones. A major disruption in this industry has been the burgeoning trend in digital shopping – to compete with rapidly growing e-commerce, even traditional retail players are upping the ante on their online platforms. Much of the products’ performance in apparel/footwear retail is cyclical, i.e., economic boom times encourage consumer spending, while recessions induce thriftiness among people. Some large-cap U.S. apparel/footwear retail companies include TJX Companies Inc., Ross Stores, Inc., Lululemon Athletica Inc. and Burlington Stores, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LULU($19.9B) has a higher market cap than GLFGF($86.9M). GLFGF YTD gains are higher at: 80.273 vs. LULU (-56.120). LULU has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.98B vs. GLFGF (-6.3M). LULU has more cash in the bank: 1.33B vs. GLFGF (211M). GLFGF has less debt than LULU: GLFGF (103M) vs LULU (1.71B). LULU has higher revenues than GLFGF: LULU (10.7B) vs GLFGF (744M).
GLFGFLULUGLFGF / LULU
Capitalization86.9M19.9B0%
EBITDA-6.3M2.98B-0%
Gain YTD80.273-56.120-143%
P/E RatioN/A11.45-
Revenue744M10.7B7%
Total Cash211M1.33B16%
Total Debt103M1.71B6%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LULU: Fundamental Ratings
LULU
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
67
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
22
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
65
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
91
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GLFGFLULU
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
17%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
6%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
6%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GLFGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LULU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
XPP27.450.55
+2.04%
ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50
DFSE39.980.46
+1.16%
Dimensional Emerging Mrkts Sstby Cr 1ETF
MFSB25.220.10
+0.39%
MFS Active Core Plus Bond ETF
CGMS27.880.07
+0.25%
Capital Group U.S. Multi-Sector Inc ETF
TPZ20.43-0.09
-0.45%
Tortoise Essential Energy Fund

GLFGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GLFGF has been loosely correlated with LULU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GLFGF jumps, then LULU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GLFGF
1D Price
Change %
GLFGF100%
N/A
LULU - GLFGF
47%
Loosely correlated
-18.58%
ANF - GLFGF
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.02%
LVLU - GLFGF
7%
Poorly correlated
+3.35%
BIRD - GLFGF
7%
Poorly correlated
-3.77%
VSCO - GLFGF
2%
Poorly correlated
+2.26%
More

LULU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LULU has been loosely correlated with ZUMZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LULU jumps, then ZUMZ could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LULU
1D Price
Change %
LULU100%
-18.58%
ZUMZ - LULU
54%
Loosely correlated
+15.50%
GLFGF - LULU
47%
Loosely correlated
N/A
GCO - LULU
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.95%
BKE - LULU
46%
Loosely correlated
-1.63%
SCVL - LULU
41%
Loosely correlated
-4.94%
More