Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLERX vs SMFPX
GLERX vs SMFPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLERX vs. SMFPX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLERX is a Hold and SMFPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.28B vs. GLERX (453M). SMFPX pays higher dividends than GLERX: SMFPX (3.40) vs GLERX (2.55). GLERX was incepted earlier than SMFPX: GLERX (8 years) vs SMFPX (13 years). SMFPX (2.15) is less costly to investors than GLERX (1.79). SMFPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. GLERX (43.00). GLERX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMFPX: GLERX (0) vs SMFPX (1000). SMFPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.26 vs. GLERX (6.80). SMFPX return over 5 years is better than : 136.95 vs. GLERX (117.46).
| GLERX | SMFPX | GLERX / SMFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.73 | 2.12 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.79 | 2.15 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.196 | 3.485 | 63% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 453M | 1.28B | 36% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.55 | 3.40 | 75% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.80 | 16.26 | 42% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.42 | 53.06 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | 117.46 | 136.95 | 86% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 47.42 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement