Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLERX vs SMFPX
GLERX vs SMFPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLERX vs. SMFPX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLERX is a Buy and SMFPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.29B vs. GLERX (469M). SMFPX pays higher dividends than GLERX: SMFPX (3.50) vs GLERX (2.63). GLERX was incepted earlier than SMFPX: GLERX (8 years) vs SMFPX (12 years). SMFPX (2.15) is less costly to investors than GLERX (1.79). SMFPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. GLERX (43.00). GLERX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMFPX: GLERX (0) vs SMFPX (1000). SMFPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.39 vs. GLERX (15.94). SMFPX return over 5 years is better than : 147.28 vs. GLERX (132.73).
| GLERX | SMFPX | GLERX / SMFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.73 | 2.12 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.79 | 2.15 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.127 | 3.588 | 115% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 469M | 1.29B | 36% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.63 | 3.50 | 75% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.94 | 23.39 | 68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.85 | 63.75 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | 132.73 | 147.28 | 90% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 26.62 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement