Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLECX vs SMFPX
GLECX vs SMFPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLECX vs. SMFPX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLECX is a Hold and SMFPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.28B vs. GLECX (453M). SMFPX pays higher dividends than GLECX: SMFPX (3.40) vs GLECX (1.80). GLECX was incepted earlier than SMFPX: GLECX (8 years) vs SMFPX (13 years). GLECX (2.29) is less costly to investors than SMFPX (2.15). SMFPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. GLECX (43.00). GLECX (1000) and SMFPX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SMFPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.26 vs. GLECX (6.21). SMFPX return over 5 years is better than : 136.95 vs. GLECX (112.63).
| GLECX | SMFPX | GLECX / SMFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.23 | 2.12 | 105% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.29 | 2.15 | 107% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.811 | 3.485 | 52% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 453M | 1.28B | 36% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.80 | 3.40 | 53% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.21 | 16.26 | 38% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.35 | 53.06 | 59% |
| Returns for 5 years | 112.63 | 136.95 | 82% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 47.42 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement