GLDG
Price
$0.80
Change
-$0.03 (-3.61%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
161.01M
8 days until earnings call
ZPHYF
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Feb 13 closing price
Capitalization
5.36M
Ad is loading...

GLDG vs ZPHYF

Header iconGLDG vs ZPHYF Comparison
Open Charts GLDG vs ZPHYFBanner chart's image
GoldMining
Price$0.80
Change-$0.03 (-3.61%)
Volume$291.15K
Capitalization161.01M
Zephyr Minerals
Price$0.03
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.32K
Capitalization5.36M
GLDG vs ZPHYF Comparison Chart
Loading...
GLDG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GLDG vs. ZPHYF commentary
Feb 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLDG is a Hold and ZPHYF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 24, 2025
Stock price -- (GLDG: $0.80 vs. ZPHYF: $0.03)
Brand notoriety: GLDG and ZPHYF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GLDG: 72% vs. ZPHYF: 7%
Market capitalization -- GLDG: $161.01M vs. ZPHYF: $5.36M
GLDG [@Precious Metals] is valued at $161.01M. ZPHYF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $5.36M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.08B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GLDG’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileZPHYF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GLDG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • ZPHYF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ZPHYF is a better buy in the long-term than GLDG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GLDG’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • GLDG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

GLDG (@Precious Metals) experienced а -1.02% price change this week, while ZPHYF (@Precious Metals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +1.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.89%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.80%.

Reported Earning Dates

GLDG is expected to report earnings on Apr 09, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+1.52% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLDG($161M) has a higher market cap than ZPHYF($5.36M). ZPHYF YTD gains are higher at: 39.269 vs. GLDG (-0.919). ZPHYF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -668.77K vs. GLDG (-20.11M). GLDG has more cash in the bank: 20.8M vs. ZPHYF (195K). GLDG (0) and ZPHYF (0) have equivalent revenues.
GLDGZPHYFGLDG / ZPHYF
Capitalization161M5.36M3,001%
EBITDA-20.11M-668.77K3,006%
Gain YTD-0.91939.269-2%
P/E Ratio1.77N/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash20.8M195K10,667%
Total Debt456KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GLDG vs ZPHYF: Fundamental Ratings
GLDG
ZPHYF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1379
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
47
Fair valued
30
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
95100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5844
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
88100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ZPHYF's Valuation (30) in the null industry is in the same range as GLDG (47). This means that ZPHYF’s stock grew similarly to GLDG’s over the last 12 months.

ZPHYF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as GLDG (100). This means that ZPHYF’s stock grew similarly to GLDG’s over the last 12 months.

GLDG's SMR Rating (95) in the null industry is in the same range as ZPHYF (100). This means that GLDG’s stock grew similarly to ZPHYF’s over the last 12 months.

ZPHYF's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as GLDG (58). This means that ZPHYF’s stock grew similarly to GLDG’s over the last 12 months.

GLDG's P/E Growth Rating (88) in the null industry is in the same range as ZPHYF (100). This means that GLDG’s stock grew similarly to ZPHYF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GLDG
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
GLDG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL245.55-0.28
-0.11%
Apple
BTC.X96273.920000-303.835940
-0.31%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY599.94-10.44
-1.71%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
GME26.42-0.62
-2.29%
GameStop Corp
TSLA337.80-16.60
-4.68%
Tesla

GLDG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GLDG has been loosely correlated with GOLD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GLDG jumps, then GOLD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GLDG
1D Price
Change %
GLDG100%
-3.78%
GOLD - GLDG
48%
Loosely correlated
-2.76%
AEM - GLDG
48%
Loosely correlated
-1.98%
AGI - GLDG
47%
Loosely correlated
-2.49%
DRD - GLDG
46%
Loosely correlated
-4.90%
RGLD - GLDG
45%
Loosely correlated
-2.49%
More

ZPHYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ZPHYF and GSRFF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ZPHYF and GSRFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ZPHYF
1D Price
Change %
ZPHYF100%
N/A
GSRFF - ZPHYF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AUMBF - ZPHYF
16%
Poorly correlated
-5.32%
GLDG - ZPHYF
1%
Poorly correlated
-3.78%
ZIJMY - ZPHYF
1%
Poorly correlated
-0.54%
GATO - ZPHYF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More