GLDG
Price
$1.42
Change
+$0.05 (+3.65%)
Updated
Feb 6 closing price
Capitalization
296.77M
22 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
NEM
Price
$115.32
Change
+$6.79 (+6.26%)
Updated
Feb 6 closing price
Capitalization
125.84B
10 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GLDG vs NEM

Header iconGLDG vs NEM Comparison
Open Charts GLDG vs NEMBanner chart's image
GoldMining
Price$1.42
Change+$0.05 (+3.65%)
Volume$2.07M
Capitalization296.77M
Newmont
Price$115.32
Change+$6.79 (+6.26%)
Volume$10.81M
Capitalization125.84B
GLDG vs NEM Comparison Chart in %
GLDG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NEM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GLDG vs. NEM commentary
Feb 09, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLDG is a Hold and NEM is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 09, 2026
Stock price -- (GLDG: $1.42 vs. NEM: $115.32)
Brand notoriety: GLDG: Not notable vs. NEM: Notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GLDG: 42% vs. NEM: 110%
Market capitalization -- GLDG: $296.77M vs. NEM: $125.84B
GLDG [@Precious Metals] is valued at $296.77M. NEM’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $125.84B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $140.39B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $4.32B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GLDG’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNEM’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • GLDG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NEM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, NEM is a better buy in the long-term than GLDG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GLDG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NEM’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GLDG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • NEM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both GLDG and NEM are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

GLDG (@Precious Metals) experienced а -10.69% price change this week, while NEM (@Precious Metals) price change was +2.64% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +175.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was +93.60%.

Reported Earning Dates

GLDG is expected to report earnings on Mar 03, 2026.

NEM is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+175.92% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NEM($126B) has a higher market cap than GLDG($297M). NEM YTD gains are higher at: 15.493 vs. GLDG (13.600). NEM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 13B vs. GLDG (-25.79M). NEM has more cash in the bank: 5.97B vs. GLDG (7.12M). GLDG has less debt than NEM: GLDG (322K) vs NEM (5.65B). NEM has higher revenues than GLDG: NEM (21.5B) vs GLDG (0).
GLDGNEMGLDG / NEM
Capitalization297M126B0%
EBITDA-25.79M13B-0%
Gain YTD13.60015.49388%
P/E RatioN/A17.93-
Revenue021.5B-
Total Cash7.12M5.97B0%
Total Debt322K5.65B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GLDG vs NEM: Fundamental Ratings
GLDG
NEM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
42
Fair valued
21
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10040
SMR RATING
1..100
9540
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
402
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8646
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NEM's Valuation (21) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as GLDG (42) in the null industry. This means that NEM’s stock grew similarly to GLDG’s over the last 12 months.

NEM's Profit vs Risk Rating (40) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GLDG (100) in the null industry. This means that NEM’s stock grew somewhat faster than GLDG’s over the last 12 months.

NEM's SMR Rating (40) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GLDG (95) in the null industry. This means that NEM’s stock grew somewhat faster than GLDG’s over the last 12 months.

NEM's Price Growth Rating (2) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GLDG (40) in the null industry. This means that NEM’s stock grew somewhat faster than GLDG’s over the last 12 months.

NEM's P/E Growth Rating (46) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GLDG (86) in the null industry. This means that NEM’s stock grew somewhat faster than GLDG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GLDGNEM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GLDG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NEM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GK25.490.83
+3.37%
AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF
IUSG165.944.06
+2.51%
iShares Core S&P US Growth ETF
GSPY37.550.71
+1.92%
Gotham Enhanced 500 ETF
KAT55.990.46
+0.82%
Scharf ETF
PFIX46.57-0.26
-0.56%
Simplify Interest Rate Hedge ETF

GLDG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GLDG has been loosely correlated with AEM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GLDG jumps, then AEM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GLDG
1D Price
Change %
GLDG100%
+3.65%
AEM - GLDG
59%
Loosely correlated
+3.77%
KGC - GLDG
59%
Loosely correlated
+2.69%
ARMN - GLDG
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.62%
NEM - GLDG
57%
Loosely correlated
+6.26%
AU - GLDG
57%
Loosely correlated
+5.44%
More

NEM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NEM has been closely correlated with RGLD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NEM jumps, then RGLD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NEM
1D Price
Change %
NEM100%
+6.26%
RGLD - NEM
84%
Closely correlated
+4.79%
WPM - NEM
84%
Closely correlated
+3.88%
CGAU - NEM
80%
Closely correlated
+5.29%
ARMN - NEM
80%
Closely correlated
-0.62%
IAG - NEM
79%
Closely correlated
+6.34%
More