GLDAF
Price
$1.50
Change
-$0.80 (-34.78%)
Updated
Sep 2 closing price
Capitalization
1.35B
SECUF
Price
$1.77
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
32.64M
Interact to see
Advertisement

GLDAF vs SECUF

Header iconGLDAF vs SECUF Comparison
Open Charts GLDAF vs SECUFBanner chart's image
GLOBALDATA
Price$1.50
Change-$0.80 (-34.78%)
Volume$35.29K
Capitalization1.35B
SSC Security Services
Price$1.77
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.67K
Capitalization32.64M
GLDAF vs SECUF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GLDAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SECUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GLDAF vs. SECUF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLDAF is a Hold and SECUF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (GLDAF: $1.50 vs. SECUF: $1.77)
Brand notoriety: GLDAF and SECUF are both not notable
GLDAF represents the Data Processing Services, while SECUF is part of the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GLDAF: 1093% vs. SECUF: 28%
Market capitalization -- GLDAF: $1.35B vs. SECUF: $32.64M
GLDAF [@Data Processing Services] is valued at $1.35B. SECUF’s [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] market capitalization is $32.64M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Data Processing Services] industry ranges from $47.23B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry ranges from $42.02B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Data Processing Services] industry is $6.11B. The average market capitalization across the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry is $4.71B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GLDAF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSECUF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • GLDAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SECUF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SECUF is a better buy in the long-term than GLDAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GLDAF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SECUF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GLDAF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SECUF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GLDAF is a better buy in the short-term than SECUF.

Price Growth

GLDAF (@Data Processing Services) experienced а -34.78% price change this week, while SECUF (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) price change was +0.01% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Data Processing Services industry was +3.95%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +36.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +37.60%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry was +3.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.37%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Data Processing Services (+3.95% weekly)

The industry involves capturing raw data from various sources, extracting meaningful information from it and presenting it in a more accessible digital format. Many people would agree that data is the new gold, which makes data processing services all the more relevant for businesses’ strategic decisions. PayPal Holdings Inc., Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. and Automatic Data Processing, Inc. some of the big players in his burgeoning industry.

@Miscellaneous Commercial Services (+3.97% weekly)

The sector produces general business services, and are not classified elsewhere. For example, FleetCor Technologies provides fuel cards and workforce payment products and services; Copart, Inc. provides online vehicle auction and remarketing services across various nations; Equifax Inc. collects and aggregates credit information on consumers and businesses worldwide, along with selling credit monitoring and fraud-prevention services. Many of the companies in this category have multi-billion market capitalizations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLDAF($1.35B) has a higher market cap than SECUF($32.6M). SECUF has higher P/E ratio than GLDAF: SECUF (120.96) vs GLDAF (55.80). SECUF YTD gains are higher at: -4.319 vs. GLDAF (-42.308). GLDAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 76.3M vs. SECUF (3.82M). GLDAF has more cash in the bank: 60M vs. SECUF (12.7M). SECUF has less debt than GLDAF: SECUF (3.1M) vs GLDAF (104M). GLDAF has higher revenues than SECUF: GLDAF (302M) vs SECUF (116M).
GLDAFSECUFGLDAF / SECUF
Capitalization1.35B32.6M4,147%
EBITDA76.3M3.82M1,999%
Gain YTD-42.308-4.319980%
P/E Ratio55.80120.9646%
Revenue302M116M260%
Total Cash60M12.7M472%
Total Debt104M3.1M3,352%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SECUF: Fundamental Ratings
SECUF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
15
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
21
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
96
SMR RATING
1..100
92
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
56
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
14
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
65

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GLDAFSECUF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
23%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
30%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GLDAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SECUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MTRJF3.80N/A
N/A
MTR Corporation Ltd.
NWSZF0.83N/A
N/A
CTF Services Limited
IREHF0.27N/A
N/A
Integrated Research Ltd.
DHTRF10.31N/A
N/A
DRI HEALTHCARE TR
ANICF0.15-0.02
-9.31%
ANONYMOUS INTELLIGENCE CO INC.

GLDAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GLDAF and BLNC have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GLDAF and BLNC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GLDAF
1D Price
Change %
GLDAF100%
N/A
BLNC - GLDAF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IPHLF - GLDAF
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MRLWF - GLDAF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SECUF - GLDAF
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.01%
WBQNL - GLDAF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SECUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SECUF has been loosely correlated with SCGPY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SECUF jumps, then SCGPY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SECUF
1D Price
Change %
SECUF100%
+0.01%
SCGPY - SECUF
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BMBLF - SECUF
33%
Poorly correlated
+1.69%
LRN - SECUF
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.93%
EXPGF - SECUF
22%
Poorly correlated
+3.43%
IVDA - SECUF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.68%
More