Advertisement
GLDAF vs MRLWF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLDAF is a Hold and MRLWF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GLDAF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMRLWF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- GLDAF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- MRLWF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GLDAF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MRLWF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- GLDAF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 1 bearish.
- MRLWF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
Price Growth
GLDAF (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MRLWF (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) price change was -2.63% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry was +1.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.69%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Miscellaneous Commercial Services (+1.02% weekly)The sector produces general business services, and are not classified elsewhere. For example, FleetCor Technologies provides fuel cards and workforce payment products and services; Copart, Inc. provides online vehicle auction and remarketing services across various nations; Equifax Inc. collects and aggregates credit information on consumers and businesses worldwide, along with selling credit monitoring and fraud-prevention services. Many of the companies in this category have multi-billion market capitalizations.
| GLDAF | MRLWF | GLDAF / MRLWF | |
| Capitalization | 1.91B | 700M | 273% |
| EBITDA | 72.7M | 49.3M | 147% |
| Gain YTD | -5.769 | 48.477 | -12% |
| P/E Ratio | 39.68 | 3333.33 | 1% |
| Revenue | 243M | 404M | 60% |
| Total Cash | 34M | 19.8M | 172% |
| Total Debt | 314M | 204M | 154% |
| GLDAF | MRLWF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 13% | 3 days ago 53% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 25% | 3 days ago 42% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 50% | 3 days ago 57% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 33% | 4 days ago 47% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 32% | 3 days ago 49% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 30% | 3 days ago 45% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 50% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 53% | 4 days ago 35% |
Advertisement
GLDAF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that GLDAF and BLNC have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GLDAF and BLNC's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GLDAF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GLDAF | 100% | N/A | ||
| BLNC - GLDAF | 20% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| IPHLF - GLDAF | 17% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| MRLWF - GLDAF | 6% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SECUF - GLDAF | 3% Poorly correlated | -2.09% | ||
| WBQNL - GLDAF | 2% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
MRLWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MRLWF has been loosely correlated with CPBLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MRLWF jumps, then CPBLF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MRLWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MRLWF | 100% | N/A | ||
| CPBLF - MRLWF | 51% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| DIGTF - MRLWF | 43% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| DAO - MRLWF | 42% Loosely correlated | -0.34% | ||
| GLDAF - MRLWF | 6% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| DCMDF - MRLWF | 4% Poorly correlated | -0.83% | ||
More | ||||