GLDAF
Price
$1.50
Change
-$0.80 (-34.78%)
Updated
Sep 2 closing price
Capitalization
1.35B
MRLWF
Price
$5.81
Change
-$0.04 (-0.68%)
Updated
Jul 28 closing price
Capitalization
459.8M
Interact to see
Advertisement

GLDAF vs MRLWF

Header iconGLDAF vs MRLWF Comparison
Open Charts GLDAF vs MRLWFBanner chart's image
GLOBALDATA
Price$1.50
Change-$0.80 (-34.78%)
Volume$35.29K
Capitalization1.35B
Marlowe
Price$5.81
Change-$0.04 (-0.68%)
Volume$325
Capitalization459.8M
GLDAF vs MRLWF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GLDAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MRLWF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GLDAF vs. MRLWF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLDAF is a Hold and MRLWF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (GLDAF: $1.50 vs. MRLWF: $5.81)
Brand notoriety: GLDAF and MRLWF are both not notable
GLDAF represents the Data Processing Services, while MRLWF is part of the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GLDAF: 1093% vs. MRLWF: 16%
Market capitalization -- GLDAF: $1.35B vs. MRLWF: $459.8M
GLDAF [@Data Processing Services] is valued at $1.35B. MRLWF’s [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] market capitalization is $459.8M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Data Processing Services] industry ranges from $47.23B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry ranges from $42.02B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Data Processing Services] industry is $6.11B. The average market capitalization across the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry is $4.71B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GLDAF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMRLWF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GLDAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MRLWF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MRLWF is a better buy in the long-term than GLDAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GLDAF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MRLWF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GLDAF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MRLWF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MRLWF is a better buy in the short-term than GLDAF.

Price Growth

GLDAF (@Data Processing Services) experienced а -34.78% price change this week, while MRLWF (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Data Processing Services industry was +3.95%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +36.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +37.60%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry was +3.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.37%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Data Processing Services (+3.95% weekly)

The industry involves capturing raw data from various sources, extracting meaningful information from it and presenting it in a more accessible digital format. Many people would agree that data is the new gold, which makes data processing services all the more relevant for businesses’ strategic decisions. PayPal Holdings Inc., Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. and Automatic Data Processing, Inc. some of the big players in his burgeoning industry.

@Miscellaneous Commercial Services (+3.97% weekly)

The sector produces general business services, and are not classified elsewhere. For example, FleetCor Technologies provides fuel cards and workforce payment products and services; Copart, Inc. provides online vehicle auction and remarketing services across various nations; Equifax Inc. collects and aggregates credit information on consumers and businesses worldwide, along with selling credit monitoring and fraud-prevention services. Many of the companies in this category have multi-billion market capitalizations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLDAF($1.35B) has a higher market cap than MRLWF($460M). MRLWF has higher P/E ratio than GLDAF: MRLWF (87.51) vs GLDAF (55.80). MRLWF YTD gains are higher at: 47.462 vs. GLDAF (-42.308). GLDAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 76.3M vs. MRLWF (43.1M). GLDAF has more cash in the bank: 60M vs. MRLWF (30.8M). MRLWF has less debt than GLDAF: MRLWF (21.6M) vs GLDAF (104M). MRLWF has higher revenues than GLDAF: MRLWF (408M) vs GLDAF (302M).
GLDAFMRLWFGLDAF / MRLWF
Capitalization1.35B460M294%
EBITDA76.3M43.1M177%
Gain YTD-42.30847.462-89%
P/E Ratio55.8087.5164%
Revenue302M408M74%
Total Cash60M30.8M195%
Total Debt104M21.6M481%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GLDAFMRLWF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
23%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
30%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
27%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
27%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GLDAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MRLWF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SSEYX592.42N/A
N/A
State Street Equity 500 Index II
TBLTX12.65N/A
N/A
Transamerica Balanced II I3
AFDVX24.02N/A
N/A
Applied Finance Explorer Investor
CAMOX29.30-0.04
-0.14%
Cambiar Opportunity Inv
LCGNX30.00-0.06
-0.20%
William Blair Large Cap Growth N

GLDAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GLDAF and BLNC have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GLDAF and BLNC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GLDAF
1D Price
Change %
GLDAF100%
N/A
BLNC - GLDAF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IPHLF - GLDAF
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MRLWF - GLDAF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SECUF - GLDAF
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.01%
WBQNL - GLDAF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MRLWF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MRLWF has been loosely correlated with CPBLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MRLWF jumps, then CPBLF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MRLWF
1D Price
Change %
MRLWF100%
N/A
CPBLF - MRLWF
51%
Loosely correlated
N/A
DIGTF - MRLWF
43%
Loosely correlated
N/A
DAO - MRLWF
42%
Loosely correlated
+4.43%
GLDAF - MRLWF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DCMDF - MRLWF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More