GLDAF
Price
$2.45
Change
+$0.33 (+15.57%)
Updated
Jun 23 closing price
Capitalization
1.91B
IPHLF
Price
$4.42
Change
-$0.58 (-11.60%)
Updated
Mar 7 closing price
Capitalization
1.25B
Interact to see
Advertisement

GLDAF vs IPHLF

Header iconGLDAF vs IPHLF Comparison
Open Charts GLDAF vs IPHLFBanner chart's image
GLOBALDATA
Price$2.45
Change+$0.33 (+15.57%)
Volume$139
Capitalization1.91B
IPH
Price$4.42
Change-$0.58 (-11.60%)
Volume$100
Capitalization1.25B
GLDAF vs IPHLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GLDAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GLDAF vs. IPHLF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLDAF is a Hold and IPHLF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (GLDAF: $2.45 vs. IPHLF: $4.42)
Brand notoriety: GLDAF and IPHLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GLDAF: 22% vs. IPHLF: 100%
Market capitalization -- GLDAF: $1.91B vs. IPHLF: $1.25B
GLDAF [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] is valued at $1.91B. IPHLF’s [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] market capitalization is $1.25B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry ranges from $80.94B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry is $5.59B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GLDAF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileIPHLF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GLDAF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • IPHLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, IPHLF is a better buy in the long-term than GLDAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GLDAF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • GLDAF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

GLDAF (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while IPHLF (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry was +0.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.21%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Miscellaneous Commercial Services (+0.86% weekly)

The sector produces general business services, and are not classified elsewhere. For example, FleetCor Technologies provides fuel cards and workforce payment products and services; Copart, Inc. provides online vehicle auction and remarketing services across various nations; Equifax Inc. collects and aggregates credit information on consumers and businesses worldwide, along with selling credit monitoring and fraud-prevention services. Many of the companies in this category have multi-billion market capitalizations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLDAF($1.91B) has a higher market cap than IPHLF($1.25B). IPHLF (40.32) and GLDAF (39.68) have similar P/E ratio . IPHLF YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. GLDAF (-5.769). IPHLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 131M vs. GLDAF (72.7M). IPHLF has more cash in the bank: 88.4M vs. GLDAF (34M). IPHLF has less debt than GLDAF: IPHLF (161M) vs GLDAF (314M). IPHLF has higher revenues than GLDAF: IPHLF (412M) vs GLDAF (243M).
GLDAFIPHLFGLDAF / IPHLF
Capitalization1.91B1.25B153%
EBITDA72.7M131M55%
Gain YTD-5.7690.000-
P/E Ratio39.6840.3298%
Revenue243M412M59%
Total Cash34M88.4M38%
Total Debt314M161M195%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GLDAFIPHLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
25%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
25%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
56%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
32%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
2%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
3%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
25%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
17%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GLDAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GSSUX41.280.26
+0.63%
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value R6
TBLRX12.340.05
+0.41%
Transamerica Balanced II R
JHQCX32.990.13
+0.40%
JPMorgan Hedged Equity C
APDGX26.130.10
+0.38%
Artisan Global Value Advisor
MLPNX6.41N/A
-0.02%
Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Plus Y

GLDAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GLDAF and BLNC have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GLDAF and BLNC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GLDAF
1D Price
Change %
GLDAF100%
N/A
BLNC - GLDAF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IPHLF - GLDAF
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MRLWF - GLDAF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SECUF - GLDAF
3%
Poorly correlated
+1.16%
WBQNL - GLDAF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

IPHLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IPHLF has been closely correlated with LXEH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IPHLF jumps, then LXEH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IPHLF
1D Price
Change %
IPHLF100%
N/A
LXEH - IPHLF
82%
Closely correlated
-0.77%
TLPFY - IPHLF
46%
Loosely correlated
+1.81%
GLDAF - IPHLF
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WBQNL - IPHLF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DLUEY - IPHLF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More