Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLCUX vs RGAHX
GLCUX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts GLCUX vs RGAHX
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Gr Insghts R6
Price$35.08
Change-$4.21 (-10.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.59B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$78.44
Change-$9.61 (-10.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
GLCUX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLCUX vs. RGAHX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLCUX is a StrongBuy and RGAHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. GLCUX (1.59B). RGAHX pays higher dividends than GLCUX: RGAHX (0.43) vs GLCUX (0.00). GLCUX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: GLCUX (11 years) vs RGAHX (10 years). GLCUX (0.58) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). GLCUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 209.00 vs. RGAHX (32.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than GLCUX: RGAHX (250) vs GLCUX (5000000). GLCUX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.36 vs. RGAHX (2.79). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 13.96 vs. GLCUX (-16.31).
| GLCUX | RGAHX | GLCUX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 0.44 | 125% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.44 | 132% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.969 | -1.010 | 393% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.59B | 336B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.43 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.36 | 2.79 | 120% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.50 | 45.40 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | -16.31 | 13.96 | -117% |
| Returns for 10 years | 74.46 | 119.50 | 62% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement