Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLCUX vs RGAHX
GLCUX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts GLCUX vs RGAHX
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Gr Insghts R6
Price$36.08
Change-$0.53 (-1.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.64B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$80.48
Change-$0.86 (-1.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
GLCUX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLCUX vs. RGAHX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLCUX is a Hold and RGAHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. GLCUX (1.64B). RGAHX pays higher dividends than GLCUX: RGAHX (0.43) vs GLCUX (0.00). GLCUX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: GLCUX (10 years) vs RGAHX (10 years). GLCUX (0.58) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). GLCUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 215.00 vs. RGAHX (32.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than GLCUX: RGAHX (250) vs GLCUX (5000000). RGAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.85 vs. GLCUX (9.35). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 21.41 vs. GLCUX (-8.66).
| GLCUX | RGAHX | GLCUX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 0.44 | 125% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.44 | 132% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.219 | 2.650 | 8% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.64B | 336B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.43 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.35 | 10.85 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.20 | 59.22 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.66 | 21.41 | -40% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.33 | 123.81 | 64% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement