Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLCUX vs RGAHX
GLCUX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts GLCUX vs RGAHX
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Gr Insghts R6
Price$37.10
Change+$0.07 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.66B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$80.14
Change+$0.24 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
GLCUX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLCUX vs. RGAHX commentary
Dec 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLCUX is a StrongBuy and RGAHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. GLCUX (1.66B). RGAHX pays higher dividends than GLCUX: RGAHX (0.44) vs GLCUX (0.05). GLCUX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: GLCUX (10 years) vs RGAHX (10 years). GLCUX (0.58) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). GLCUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 215.00 vs. RGAHX (32.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than GLCUX: RGAHX (250) vs GLCUX (5000000). RGAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.75 vs. GLCUX (5.28). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 23.10 vs. GLCUX (-6.59).
| GLCUX | RGAHX | GLCUX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 0.44 | 125% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.44 | 132% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.246 | 9.123 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.66B | 339B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.05 | 0.44 | 12% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.28 | 5.75 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 71.57 | 65.91 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.59 | 23.10 | -29% |
| Returns for 10 years | 64.33 | 96.48 | 67% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement