Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLCCX vs RGAHX
GLCCX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts GLCCX vs RGAHX
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Gr Insghts C
Price$23.89
Change-$0.04 (-0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.65B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$88.05
Change-$0.01 (-0.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.52B
GLCCX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLCCX vs. RGAHX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLCCX is a Hold and RGAHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 341B vs. GLCCX (1.65B). RGAHX pays higher dividends than GLCCX: RGAHX (0.44) vs GLCCX (0.00). GLCCX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: GLCCX (28 years) vs RGAHX (10 years). GLCCX (1.70) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). GLCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 215.00 vs. RGAHX (25.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than GLCCX: RGAHX (250) vs GLCCX (1000). RGAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.02 vs. GLCCX (-1.81). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 40.79 vs. GLCCX (-31.94).
| GLCCX | RGAHX | GLCCX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 0.44 | 380% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.70 | 0.44 | 386% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.522 | 19.894 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.65B | 341B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.44 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.81 | 9.02 | -20% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.05 | 65.43 | 31% |
| Returns for 5 years | -31.94 | 40.79 | -78% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.65 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement