Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLCCX vs RGAHX
GLCCX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts GLCCX vs RGAHX
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Gr Insghts C
Price$20.07
Change-$3.65 (-15.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.59B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$78.44
Change-$9.61 (-10.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
GLCCX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLCCX vs. RGAHX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLCCX is a StrongBuy and RGAHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. GLCCX (1.59B). RGAHX pays higher dividends than GLCCX: RGAHX (0.43) vs GLCCX (0.00). GLCCX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: GLCCX (28 years) vs RGAHX (10 years). GLCCX (1.70) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). GLCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 209.00 vs. RGAHX (32.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than GLCCX: RGAHX (250) vs GLCCX (1000). RGAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.79 vs. GLCCX (-2.81). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 13.96 vs. GLCCX (-42.43).
| GLCCX | RGAHX | GLCCX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 0.44 | 380% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.70 | 0.44 | 386% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.063 | -1.010 | 402% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.59B | 336B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.43 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.81 | 2.79 | -101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.42 | 45.40 | 47% |
| Returns for 5 years | -42.43 | 13.96 | -304% |
| Returns for 10 years | 8.37 | 119.50 | 7% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement