GLBZ
Price
$4.64
Change
-$0.13 (-2.73%)
Updated
Nov 14, 10:36 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
13.93M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
KFFB
Price
$4.33
Change
+$0.33 (+8.25%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
35.02M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GLBZ vs KFFB

Header iconGLBZ vs KFFB Comparison
Open Charts GLBZ vs KFFBBanner chart's image
Glen Burnie Ban
Price$4.64
Change-$0.13 (-2.73%)
Volume$300
Capitalization13.93M
Kentucky First Federal Ban
Price$4.33
Change+$0.33 (+8.25%)
Volume$6.83K
Capitalization35.02M
GLBZ vs KFFB Comparison Chart in %
GLBZ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
KFFB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GLBZ vs. KFFB commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLBZ is a Hold and KFFB is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (GLBZ: $4.77 vs. KFFB: $4.33)
Brand notoriety: GLBZ and KFFB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GLBZ: 410% vs. KFFB: 34%
Market capitalization -- GLBZ: $13.93M vs. KFFB: $35.02M
GLBZ [@Regional Banks] is valued at $13.93M. KFFB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $35.02M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $171.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.19B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GLBZ’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileKFFB’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GLBZ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • KFFB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GLBZ is a better buy in the long-term than KFFB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GLBZ’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KFFB’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GLBZ’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • KFFB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, KFFB is a better buy in the short-term than GLBZ.

Price Growth

GLBZ (@Regional Banks) experienced а +5.53% price change this week, while KFFB (@Regional Banks) price change was +14.85% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.37%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.09% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KFFB($35M) has a higher market cap than GLBZ($13.9M). GLBZ has higher P/E ratio than KFFB: GLBZ (469.00) vs KFFB (70.00). KFFB YTD gains are higher at: 34.053 vs. GLBZ (-18.112). GLBZ has more cash in the bank: 9.09M vs. KFFB (1.91M). GLBZ has less debt than KFFB: GLBZ (13M) vs KFFB (53.4M). GLBZ has higher revenues than KFFB: GLBZ (11.6M) vs KFFB (8.38M).
GLBZKFFBGLBZ / KFFB
Capitalization13.9M35M40%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-18.11234.053-53%
P/E Ratio469.0070.00670%
Revenue11.6M8.38M138%
Total Cash9.09M1.91M477%
Total Debt13M53.4M24%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GLBZ vs KFFB: Fundamental Ratings
GLBZ
KFFB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2012
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
98
Overvalued
94
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9091
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6138
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
497
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KFFB's Valuation (94) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as GLBZ (98) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that KFFB’s stock grew similarly to GLBZ’s over the last 12 months.

KFFB's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as GLBZ (100) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that KFFB’s stock grew similarly to GLBZ’s over the last 12 months.

GLBZ's SMR Rating (90) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as KFFB (91) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that GLBZ’s stock grew similarly to KFFB’s over the last 12 months.

KFFB's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as GLBZ (61) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that KFFB’s stock grew similarly to GLBZ’s over the last 12 months.

GLBZ's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for KFFB (97) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that GLBZ’s stock grew significantly faster than KFFB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GLBZKFFB
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
51%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
47%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GLBZ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
KFFB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RRR58.950.72
+1.24%
Red Rock Resorts
SAIH7.00N/A
N/A
SAIHEAT Limited
RSKD4.99-0.09
-1.77%
Riskified Ltd
HPE22.93-0.55
-2.34%
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company
PLX1.93-0.21
-9.81%
Protalix BioTherapeutics

GLBZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GLBZ and PBBK have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GLBZ and PBBK's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GLBZ
1D Price
Change %
GLBZ100%
+5.76%
PBBK - GLBZ
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.24%
FSEA - GLBZ
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JMSB - GLBZ
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.15%
FLG - GLBZ
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.27%
KFFB - GLBZ
22%
Poorly correlated
+8.25%
More

KFFB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KFFB and CFBK have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KFFB and CFBK's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KFFB
1D Price
Change %
KFFB100%
-2.44%
CFBK - KFFB
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.62%
FSEA - KFFB
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.78%
ELMA - KFFB
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PBHC - KFFB
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.85%
CHMG - KFFB
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.81%
More