GLBXF
Price
$0.98
Change
-$0.01 (-1.01%)
Updated
Sep 8 closing price
Capitalization
55.12M
IVPAF
Price
$9.06
Change
+$0.25 (+2.84%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
12.02B
69 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

GLBXF vs IVPAF

Header iconGLBXF vs IVPAF Comparison
Open Charts GLBXF vs IVPAFBanner chart's image
Globex Mining Enterprises
Price$0.98
Change-$0.01 (-1.01%)
Volume$39.51K
Capitalization55.12M
Ivanhoe Mines
Price$9.06
Change+$0.25 (+2.84%)
Volume$95.73K
Capitalization12.02B
GLBXF vs IVPAF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GLBXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IVPAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GLBXF vs. IVPAF commentary
Sep 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLBXF is a Hold and IVPAF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 09, 2025
Stock price -- (GLBXF: $0.98 vs. IVPAF: $8.88)
Brand notoriety: GLBXF and IVPAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GLBXF: 131% vs. IVPAF: 61%
Market capitalization -- GLBXF: $55.12M vs. IVPAF: $12.02B
GLBXF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $55.12M. IVPAF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $12.02B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.3B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GLBXF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileIVPAF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GLBXF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • IVPAF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GLBXF is a better buy in the long-term than IVPAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GLBXF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IVPAF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GLBXF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • IVPAF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, IVPAF is a better buy in the short-term than GLBXF.

Price Growth

GLBXF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +0.41% price change this week, while IVPAF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +0.46% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +5.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was +58.71%.

Reported Earning Dates

IVPAF is expected to report earnings on Nov 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+5.71% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IVPAF($12B) has a higher market cap than GLBXF($55.1M). GLBXF has higher P/E ratio than IVPAF: GLBXF (136.19) vs IVPAF (30.62). GLBXF YTD gains are higher at: 19.273 vs. IVPAF (-23.480). IVPAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 355M vs. GLBXF (-3.46M). IVPAF has more cash in the bank: 655M vs. GLBXF (31.6M). IVPAF has higher revenues than GLBXF: IVPAF (215M) vs GLBXF (982K).
GLBXFIVPAFGLBXF / IVPAF
Capitalization55.1M12B0%
EBITDA-3.46M355M-1%
Gain YTD19.273-23.480-82%
P/E Ratio136.1930.62445%
Revenue982K215M0%
Total Cash31.6M655M5%
Total DebtN/A1.17B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GLBXF vs IVPAF: Fundamental Ratings
GLBXF
IVPAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1150
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
90
Overvalued
91
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5957
SMR RATING
1..100
9177
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5155
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
398
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GLBXF's Valuation (90) in the null industry is in the same range as IVPAF (91). This means that GLBXF’s stock grew similarly to IVPAF’s over the last 12 months.

IVPAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (57) in the null industry is in the same range as GLBXF (59). This means that IVPAF’s stock grew similarly to GLBXF’s over the last 12 months.

IVPAF's SMR Rating (77) in the null industry is in the same range as GLBXF (91). This means that IVPAF’s stock grew similarly to GLBXF’s over the last 12 months.

GLBXF's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as IVPAF (55). This means that GLBXF’s stock grew similarly to IVPAF’s over the last 12 months.

GLBXF's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for IVPAF (98). This means that GLBXF’s stock grew significantly faster than IVPAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GLBXFIVPAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GLBXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IVPAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IOTX.X0.0267770.001717
+6.85%
IoTeX cryptocurrency
FIDA.X0.0864220.001536
+1.81%
Bonfida (aka SNS) cryptocurrency
RDNT.X0.0205770.000350
+1.73%
Radiant Capital cryptocurrency
UNI.X9.3948560.060064
+0.64%
Uniswap cryptocurrency
RGT.X0.061930N/A
N/A
Rari Governance Token cryptocurrency

GLBXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GLBXF and AAGFF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GLBXF and AAGFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GLBXF
1D Price
Change %
GLBXF100%
-0.92%
AAGFF - GLBXF
23%
Poorly correlated
+3.04%
IVPAF - GLBXF
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.99%
GLCNF - GLBXF
19%
Poorly correlated
+0.26%
GLNCY - GLBXF
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GLATF - GLBXF
4%
Poorly correlated
+13.57%
More

IVPAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IVPAF has been loosely correlated with GLNCY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IVPAF jumps, then GLNCY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IVPAF
1D Price
Change %
IVPAF100%
+2.84%
GLNCY - IVPAF
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.65%
GLCNF - IVPAF
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.79%
GMBXF - IVPAF
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.74%
BDNNY - IVPAF
49%
Loosely correlated
+2.34%
FMCXF - IVPAF
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.44%
More