GLBS
Price
$1.11
Change
-$0.01 (-0.89%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
22.85M
60 days until earnings call
ICON
Price
$2.63
Change
-$0.30 (-10.24%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
5.75M
44 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

GLBS vs ICON

Header iconGLBS vs ICON Comparison
Open Charts GLBS vs ICONBanner chart's image
Globus Maritime
Price$1.11
Change-$0.01 (-0.89%)
Volume$17.96K
Capitalization22.85M
Icon Energy
Price$2.63
Change-$0.30 (-10.24%)
Volume$85.18K
Capitalization5.75M
GLBS vs ICON Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GLBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ICON
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GLBS vs. ICON commentary
Jul 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLBS is a Hold and ICON is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 28, 2025
Stock price -- (GLBS: $1.11 vs. ICON: $2.63)
Brand notoriety: GLBS and ICON are both not notable
Both companies represent the Marine Shipping industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GLBS: 37% vs. ICON: 6%
Market capitalization -- GLBS: $22.85M vs. ICON: $5.75M
GLBS [@Marine Shipping] is valued at $22.85M. ICON’s [@Marine Shipping] market capitalization is $5.75M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Marine Shipping] industry ranges from $34.59B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Marine Shipping] industry is $4.93B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GLBS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileICON’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GLBS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • ICON’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ICON is a better buy in the long-term than GLBS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GLBS’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ICON’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GLBS’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • ICON’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both GLBS and ICON are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

GLBS (@Marine Shipping) experienced а -1.77% price change this week, while ICON (@Marine Shipping) price change was -13.49% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Marine Shipping industry was +3.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.96%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.06%.

Reported Earning Dates

GLBS is expected to report earnings on Sep 26, 2025.

ICON is expected to report earnings on Sep 09, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Marine Shipping (+3.07% weekly)

The marine shipping industry provides passenger transportation or cargo shipping services via waterways. This industry includes freight towage, ferry services and warehousing on deep-sea and inland waterways. The aviation sector may have reduced the popularity of sea travel for several passengers, but it is still in demand for short trips and pleasure cruises. Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. Cum Red Perp Pfd., Kirby Corporation and Seaspan Corporation are some of the well-known names in the business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLBS($22.8M) has a higher market cap than ICON($5.75M). GLBS has higher P/E ratio than ICON: GLBS (64.00) vs ICON (0.17). GLBS YTD gains are higher at: -5.128 vs. ICON (-96.937). ICON has less debt than GLBS: ICON (15.9M) vs GLBS (138M).
GLBSICONGLBS / ICON
Capitalization22.8M5.75M397%
EBITDA16.2MN/A-
Gain YTD-5.128-96.9375%
P/E Ratio64.000.1737,811%
Revenue34.9MN/A-
Total Cash46.8MN/A-
Total Debt138M15.9M868%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GLBS vs ICON: Fundamental Ratings
GLBS
ICON
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6533
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
73
Overvalued
1
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
8985
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8364
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ICON's Valuation (1) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry is significantly better than the same rating for GLBS (73) in the Marine Shipping industry. This means that ICON’s stock grew significantly faster than GLBS’s over the last 12 months.

ICON's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry is in the same range as GLBS (100) in the Marine Shipping industry. This means that ICON’s stock grew similarly to GLBS’s over the last 12 months.

ICON's SMR Rating (85) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry is in the same range as GLBS (89) in the Marine Shipping industry. This means that ICON’s stock grew similarly to GLBS’s over the last 12 months.

ICON's Price Growth Rating (64) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry is in the same range as GLBS (83) in the Marine Shipping industry. This means that ICON’s stock grew similarly to GLBS’s over the last 12 months.

GLBS's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the Marine Shipping industry is significantly better than the same rating for ICON (100) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry. This means that GLBS’s stock grew significantly faster than ICON’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GLBSICON
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
87%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GLBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ICON
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ASUR10.460.06
+0.58%
Asure Software
GMS109.700.15
+0.14%
GMS
MTAL12.07-0.04
-0.33%
MAC Copper Limited
GVH7.20-0.05
-0.69%
Globavend Holdings Limited
EBAY81.43-1.02
-1.24%
eBay

GLBS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GLBS and TORO have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GLBS and TORO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GLBS
1D Price
Change %
GLBS100%
-0.90%
TORO - GLBS
25%
Poorly correlated
+5.63%
USEA - GLBS
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.02%
SMHI - GLBS
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.44%
EDRY - GLBS
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.37%
NMM - GLBS
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.02%
More

ICON and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ICON and CTRM have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ICON and CTRM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ICON
1D Price
Change %
ICON100%
-10.24%
CTRM - ICON
24%
Poorly correlated
-3.35%
USEA - ICON
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.02%
GLBS - ICON
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.90%
TORO - ICON
20%
Poorly correlated
+5.63%
EDRY - ICON
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.37%
More