Advertisement
GLBS vs ICON
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLBS is a Hold and ICON is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GLBS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileICON’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- GLBS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- ICON’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GLBS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ICON’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- GLBS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- ICON’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
GLBS (@Marine Shipping) experienced а +0.86% price change this week, while ICON (@Marine Shipping) price change was +9.59% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Marine Shipping industry was +2.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.77%.
Reported Earning Dates
GLBS is expected to report earnings on Sep 26, 2025.
ICON is expected to report earnings on Sep 09, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Marine Shipping (+2.57% weekly)The marine shipping industry provides passenger transportation or cargo shipping services via waterways. This industry includes freight towage, ferry services and warehousing on deep-sea and inland waterways. The aviation sector may have reduced the popularity of sea travel for several passengers, but it is still in demand for short trips and pleasure cruises. Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. Cum Red Perp Pfd., Kirby Corporation and Seaspan Corporation are some of the well-known names in the business.
| GLBS | ICON | GLBS / ICON | |
| Capitalization | 24.1M | 5.25M | 459% |
| EBITDA | 16.2M | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.000 | -97.205 | - |
| P/E Ratio | 64.00 | 0.17 | 37,811% |
| Revenue | 34.9M | N/A | - |
| Total Cash | 46.8M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 138M | 15.9M | 868% |
GLBS | ICON | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 72 Overvalued | 1 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 89 | 85 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | 49 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 3 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ICON's Valuation (1) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry is significantly better than the same rating for GLBS (72) in the Marine Shipping industry. This means that ICON’s stock grew significantly faster than GLBS’s over the last 12 months.
ICON's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry is in the same range as GLBS (100) in the Marine Shipping industry. This means that ICON’s stock grew similarly to GLBS’s over the last 12 months.
ICON's SMR Rating (85) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry is in the same range as GLBS (89) in the Marine Shipping industry. This means that ICON’s stock grew similarly to GLBS’s over the last 12 months.
ICON's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry is in the same range as GLBS (61) in the Marine Shipping industry. This means that ICON’s stock grew similarly to GLBS’s over the last 12 months.
GLBS's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the Marine Shipping industry is significantly better than the same rating for ICON (100) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry. This means that GLBS’s stock grew significantly faster than ICON’s over the last 12 months.
| GLBS | ICON | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 73% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 75% | 4 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 70% | 4 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 73% | 10 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 88% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 77% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 64% | 4 days ago 90% |
Advertisement
GLBS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that GLBS and TORO have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GLBS and TORO's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GLBS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GLBS | 100% | +0.86% | ||
| TORO - GLBS | 25% Poorly correlated | +1.82% | ||
| SMHI - GLBS | 22% Poorly correlated | +3.49% | ||
| ZIM - GLBS | 22% Poorly correlated | -2.35% | ||
| USEA - GLBS | 21% Poorly correlated | +1.21% | ||
| CTRM - GLBS | 21% Poorly correlated | +3.18% | ||
More | ||||
ICON and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that ICON and CTRM have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ICON and CTRM's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ICON | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICON | 100% | -3.61% | ||
| CTRM - ICON | 26% Poorly correlated | +3.18% | ||
| GLBS - ICON | 20% Poorly correlated | +0.86% | ||
| EDRY - ICON | 20% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SMHI - ICON | 7% Poorly correlated | +3.49% | ||
| KEX - ICON | 6% Poorly correlated | -0.42% | ||
More | ||||