GLBKF
Price
$0.15
Change
-$0.07 (-31.82%)
Updated
Jun 20 closing price
Capitalization
44.01M
IMRFF
Price
$0.10
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 20 closing price
Capitalization
5.51M
Interact to see
Advertisement

GLBKF vs IMRFF

Header iconGLBKF vs IMRFF Comparison
Open Charts GLBKF vs IMRFFBanner chart's image
Goldbank Mining
Price$0.15
Change-$0.07 (-31.82%)
Volume$100
Capitalization44.01M
iMetal Resources
Price$0.10
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100
Capitalization5.51M
GLBKF vs IMRFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
IMRFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GLBKF vs. IMRFF commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLBKF is a Hold and IMRFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (GLBKF: $0.15 vs. IMRFF: $0.10)
Brand notoriety: GLBKF and IMRFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GLBKF: 100% vs. IMRFF: 0%
Market capitalization -- GLBKF: $44.01M vs. IMRFF: $5.51M
GLBKF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $44.01M. IMRFF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $5.51M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GLBKF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileIMRFF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GLBKF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • IMRFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GLBKF is a better buy in the long-term than IMRFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IMRFF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • IMRFF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 1 bearish.

Price Growth

GLBKF (@Precious Metals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while IMRFF (@Precious Metals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.26%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+0.06% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLBKF($44M) has a higher market cap than IMRFF($5.51M). GLBKF YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. IMRFF (-50.249). GLBKF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -227.64K vs. IMRFF (-2.26M). IMRFF has more cash in the bank: 1.51M vs. GLBKF (370K). IMRFF has less debt than GLBKF: IMRFF (9.92K) vs GLBKF (228K). GLBKF (0) and IMRFF (0) have equivalent revenues.
GLBKFIMRFFGLBKF / IMRFF
Capitalization44M5.51M799%
EBITDA-227.64K-2.26M10%
Gain YTD0.000-50.249-
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash370K1.51M24%
Total Debt228K9.92K2,299%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GLBKF vs IMRFF: Fundamental Ratings
GLBKF
IMRFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
20
Undervalued
45
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
35100
SMR RATING
1..100
10097
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7192
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GLBKF's Valuation (20) in the null industry is in the same range as IMRFF (45). This means that GLBKF’s stock grew similarly to IMRFF’s over the last 12 months.

GLBKF's Profit vs Risk Rating (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IMRFF (100). This means that GLBKF’s stock grew somewhat faster than IMRFF’s over the last 12 months.

IMRFF's SMR Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as GLBKF (100). This means that IMRFF’s stock grew similarly to GLBKF’s over the last 12 months.

GLBKF's Price Growth Rating (71) in the null industry is in the same range as IMRFF (92). This means that GLBKF’s stock grew similarly to IMRFF’s over the last 12 months.

GLBKF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as IMRFF (100). This means that GLBKF’s stock grew similarly to IMRFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GLBKFIMRFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
11%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
10%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IMRFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HRB54.700.38
+0.70%
H&R Block
UVV58.64-0.88
-1.48%
Universal Corp
LLY775.45-19.67
-2.47%
Eli Lilly & Co
ADUR9.59-0.65
-6.35%
Aduro Clean Technologies Inc
ALMS3.02-0.28
-8.48%
Alumis Inc.

GLBKF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GLBKF has been loosely correlated with ZIJMY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GLBKF jumps, then ZIJMY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GLBKF
1D Price
Change %
GLBKF100%
N/A
ZIJMY - GLBKF
36%
Loosely correlated
+3.48%
ELKMF - GLBKF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WEXPF - GLBKF
24%
Poorly correlated
-6.39%
OGNRF - GLBKF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.24%
RMLRF - GLBKF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.56%
More

IMRFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IMRFF and VITFF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IMRFF and VITFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IMRFF
1D Price
Change %
IMRFF100%
N/A
VITFF - IMRFF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KGSSF - IMRFF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GLBKF - IMRFF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HELOF - IMRFF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DYNR - IMRFF
21%
Poorly correlated
+7.14%
More