GLBE
Price
$33.62
Change
-$0.28 (-0.83%)
Updated
Feb 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
5.75B
21 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
LQDT
Price
$31.43
Change
-$0.07 (-0.22%)
Updated
Feb 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
969.47M
One day until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GLBE vs LQDT

Header iconGLBE vs LQDT Comparison
Open Charts GLBE vs LQDTBanner chart's image
Global-E Online
Price$33.62
Change-$0.28 (-0.83%)
Volume$19.25K
Capitalization5.75B
Liquidity Services
Price$31.43
Change-$0.07 (-0.22%)
Volume$1.12K
Capitalization969.47M
GLBE vs LQDT Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GLBE vs. LQDT commentary
Feb 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLBE is a StrongBuy and LQDT is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 05, 2026
Stock price -- (GLBE: $33.90 vs. LQDT: $31.50)
Brand notoriety: GLBE and LQDT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Internet Retail industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GLBE: 270% vs. LQDT: 96%
Market capitalization -- GLBE: $5.75B vs. LQDT: $969.47M
GLBE [@Internet Retail] is valued at $5.75B. LQDT’s [@Internet Retail] market capitalization is $969.47M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Internet Retail] industry ranges from $2.55T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Internet Retail] industry is $53.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GLBE’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLQDT’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GLBE’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LQDT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, LQDT is a better buy in the long-term than GLBE.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GLBE’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LQDT’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GLBE’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • LQDT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LQDT is a better buy in the short-term than GLBE.

Price Growth

GLBE (@Internet Retail) experienced а -11.12% price change this week, while LQDT (@Internet Retail) price change was -1.56% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Retail industry was -2.87%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.27%.

Reported Earning Dates

GLBE is expected to report earnings on Feb 25, 2026.

LQDT is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Internet Retail (-2.87% weekly)

The internet retail industry includes companies that sell products and services through the Internet. With more and more consumers using online retailers, the companies have seen a big increase in the use of their services. Some of the companies in the group are focused on selling business-to-business products and services. Others sell business-to-consumer products and services. Internet retailers offer a wide variety of products like books, apparel, and electronics. Some companies even specialize in only one or two categories. One potentially critical factor for players to thrive in this space is the quality and speed of product delivery. This requires an investment in efficient distribution networks. Things like logistics are important factors in the success in the extremely competitive industry. For a company to stay relevant in the industry it must have effective pricing strategies and upgraded websites. The websites must be easy to navigate and engaging for customers. In addition to the revenues generated from straight sales, internet retailers can generate revenue from subscription fees and advertising. Amazon.com, Inc., Alibaba Group, and JD.com are some of the global leaders.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLBE($5.75B) has a higher market cap than LQDT($969M). GLBE has higher P/E ratio than LQDT: GLBE (847.00) vs LQDT (36.17). LQDT YTD gains are higher at: 3.926 vs. GLBE (-13.762). GLBE has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 182M vs. LQDT (45.5M). GLBE has more cash in the bank: 552M vs. LQDT (186M). LQDT has less debt than GLBE: LQDT (13.8M) vs GLBE (24M). GLBE has higher revenues than LQDT: GLBE (888M) vs LQDT (477M).
GLBELQDTGLBE / LQDT
Capitalization5.75B969M593%
EBITDA182M45.5M400%
Gain YTD-13.7623.926-351%
P/E Ratio847.0036.172,342%
Revenue888M477M186%
Total Cash552M186M297%
Total Debt24M13.8M174%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LQDT: Fundamental Ratings
LQDT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
76
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
76
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
52
SMR RATING
1..100
55
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
43
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
83
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
45

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GLBELQDT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GLBE
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
LQDT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CFXRX15.690.05
+0.32%
Columbia Flexible Capital Income Inst2
REEBX62.50-0.06
-0.10%
American Funds EUPAC R2E
RSEIX14.93-0.11
-0.73%
Royce Small-Cap Special Equity Instl
DUSLX42.90-0.45
-1.04%
DFA US Large Cap Growth Instl
LSGGX23.51-0.57
-2.37%
Loomis Sayles Global Growth Y

GLBE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GLBE has been loosely correlated with CVNA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GLBE jumps, then CVNA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GLBE
1D Price
Change %
GLBE100%
-7.25%
CVNA - GLBE
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.61%
AMZN - GLBE
54%
Loosely correlated
-1.79%
W - GLBE
49%
Loosely correlated
N/A
RVLV - GLBE
44%
Loosely correlated
-3.09%
DASH - GLBE
43%
Loosely correlated
-2.73%
More

LQDT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LQDT has been loosely correlated with CVNA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LQDT jumps, then CVNA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LQDT
1D Price
Change %
LQDT100%
-3.49%
CVNA - LQDT
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.61%
RVLV - LQDT
30%
Poorly correlated
-3.09%
SE - LQDT
27%
Poorly correlated
-4.75%
GLBE - LQDT
27%
Poorly correlated
-7.25%
W - LQDT
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More