GLATF
Price
$0.52
Change
+$0.05 (+10.64%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
260.78M
WSTRF
Price
$0.59
Change
+$0.01 (+1.72%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
32.56M
Interact to see
Advertisement

GLATF vs WSTRF

Header iconGLATF vs WSTRF Comparison
Open Charts GLATF vs WSTRFBanner chart's image
Global Atomic
Price$0.52
Change+$0.05 (+10.64%)
Volume$631.34K
Capitalization260.78M
Western Uranium & Vanadium
Price$0.59
Change+$0.01 (+1.72%)
Volume$177.01K
Capitalization32.56M
GLATF vs WSTRF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GLATF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WSTRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GLATF vs. WSTRF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLATF is a Hold and WSTRF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (GLATF: $0.52 vs. WSTRF: $0.59)
Brand notoriety: GLATF and WSTRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GLATF: 139% vs. WSTRF: 232%
Market capitalization -- GLATF: $260.78M vs. WSTRF: $32.56M
GLATF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $260.78M. WSTRF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $32.56M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GLATF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWSTRF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GLATF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WSTRF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GLATF is a better buy in the long-term than WSTRF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GLATF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WSTRF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GLATF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • WSTRF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GLATF is a better buy in the short-term than WSTRF.

Price Growth

GLATF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +1.96% price change this week, while WSTRF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -4.54% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.03%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.13% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLATF($261M) has a higher market cap than WSTRF($32.6M). GLATF YTD gains are higher at: -7.899 vs. WSTRF (-14.277). WSTRF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -683.48K vs. GLATF (-8.93M). GLATF has more cash in the bank: 52.1M vs. WSTRF (8.44M). WSTRF has less debt than GLATF: WSTRF (73.1K) vs GLATF (703K). WSTRF has higher revenues than GLATF: WSTRF (7.87M) vs GLATF (848K).
GLATFWSTRFGLATF / WSTRF
Capitalization261M32.6M801%
EBITDA-8.93M-683.48K1,306%
Gain YTD-7.899-14.27755%
P/E Ratio5000.00N/A-
Revenue848K7.87M11%
Total Cash52.1M8.44M618%
Total Debt703K73.1K962%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GLATF vs WSTRF: Fundamental Ratings
GLATF
WSTRF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
92
Overvalued
65
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9596
SMR RATING
1..100
8997
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6489
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WSTRF's Valuation (65) in the null industry is in the same range as GLATF (92). This means that WSTRF’s stock grew similarly to GLATF’s over the last 12 months.

GLATF's Profit vs Risk Rating (95) in the null industry is in the same range as WSTRF (96). This means that GLATF’s stock grew similarly to WSTRF’s over the last 12 months.

GLATF's SMR Rating (89) in the null industry is in the same range as WSTRF (97). This means that GLATF’s stock grew similarly to WSTRF’s over the last 12 months.

GLATF's Price Growth Rating (64) in the null industry is in the same range as WSTRF (89). This means that GLATF’s stock grew similarly to WSTRF’s over the last 12 months.

GLATF's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for WSTRF (100). This means that GLATF’s stock grew significantly faster than WSTRF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GLATFWSTRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
86%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GLATF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WSTRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ASCZX10.770.12
+1.13%
Alger Small Cap Growth Z
WQAIX12.140.08
+0.66%
Westwood Quality AllCap Institutional
FMSTX34.020.21
+0.62%
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Value IS
FASGX29.740.12
+0.41%
Fidelity Asset Manager 70%
JCVCX24.620.05
+0.20%
JHancock Classic Value C

GLATF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GLATF has been loosely correlated with MGAFF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GLATF jumps, then MGAFF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GLATF
1D Price
Change %
GLATF100%
+11.16%
MGAFF - GLATF
50%
Loosely correlated
+1.36%
SYHBF - GLATF
46%
Loosely correlated
+2.36%
WSTRF - GLATF
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.68%
ISOU - GLATF
41%
Loosely correlated
+1.01%
SRUUF - GLATF
38%
Loosely correlated
-2.19%
More

WSTRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WSTRF has been loosely correlated with ISOU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WSTRF jumps, then ISOU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WSTRF
1D Price
Change %
WSTRF100%
+0.68%
ISOU - WSTRF
54%
Loosely correlated
+1.01%
MGAFF - WSTRF
51%
Loosely correlated
+1.36%
SRUUF - WSTRF
50%
Loosely correlated
-2.19%
SYHBF - WSTRF
46%
Loosely correlated
+2.36%
GLATF - WSTRF
44%
Loosely correlated
+11.16%
More