GLATF vs SYHBF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLATF is a Hold and SYHBF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GLATF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSYHBF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- GLATF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- SYHBF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GLATF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SYHBF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- GLATF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
- SYHBF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
GLATF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +10.81% price change this week, while SYHBF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +11.31% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +2.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.15%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Other Metals/Minerals (+2.44% weekly)The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.
| GLATF | SYHBF | GLATF / SYHBF | |
| Capitalization | 261M | 42.3M | 617% |
| EBITDA | -8.93M | -4.71M | 190% |
| Gain YTD | 8.928 | 6.808 | 131% |
| P/E Ratio | 5000.00 | 53.76 | 9,300% |
| Revenue | 848K | 0 | - |
| Total Cash | 52.1M | 6.8M | 766% |
| Total Debt | 703K | N/A | - |
GLATF | SYHBF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 2 | 6 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 100 Overvalued | 79 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 88 | 66 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 91 | 93 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 65 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SYHBF's Valuation (79) in the null industry is in the same range as GLATF (100). This means that SYHBF’s stock grew similarly to GLATF’s over the last 12 months.
SYHBF's Profit vs Risk Rating (66) in the null industry is in the same range as GLATF (88). This means that SYHBF’s stock grew similarly to GLATF’s over the last 12 months.
GLATF's SMR Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as SYHBF (93). This means that GLATF’s stock grew similarly to SYHBF’s over the last 12 months.
SYHBF's Price Growth Rating (61) in the null industry is in the same range as GLATF (65). This means that SYHBF’s stock grew similarly to GLATF’s over the last 12 months.
GLATF's P/E Growth Rating (58) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SYHBF (100). This means that GLATF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SYHBF’s over the last 12 months.
| GLATF | SYHBF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 82% | 9 days ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 90% | 9 days ago 89% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 75% | 9 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 84% | 9 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 83% | 9 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 20 days ago 84% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 84% | 15 days ago 87% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 84% | 9 days ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 86% | 9 days ago 89% |
GLATF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GLATF has been loosely correlated with MGAFF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GLATF jumps, then MGAFF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GLATF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GLATF | 100% | +1.56% | ||
| MGAFF - GLATF | 50% Loosely correlated | +2.69% | ||
| SYHBF - GLATF | 46% Loosely correlated | +2.34% | ||
| WSTRF - GLATF | 44% Loosely correlated | +0.01% | ||
| ISENF - GLATF | 41% Loosely correlated | +0.48% | ||
| FCUUF - GLATF | 39% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
SYHBF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SYHBF has been loosely correlated with ISENF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SYHBF jumps, then ISENF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SYHBF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SYHBF | 100% | +2.34% | ||
| ISENF - SYHBF | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.48% | ||
| MGAFF - SYHBF | 53% Loosely correlated | +2.69% | ||
| SRUUF - SYHBF | 49% Loosely correlated | +3.14% | ||
| GLATF - SYHBF | 46% Loosely correlated | +1.56% | ||
| WSTRF - SYHBF | 46% Loosely correlated | +0.01% | ||
More | ||||