GLATF
Price
$0.51
Change
-$0.02 (-3.77%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
173.32M
IVPAF
Price
$10.14
Change
+$0.26 (+2.63%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
13.73B
49 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

GLATF vs IVPAF

Header iconGLATF vs IVPAF Comparison
Open Charts GLATF vs IVPAFBanner chart's image
Global Atomic
Price$0.51
Change-$0.02 (-3.77%)
Volume$397.58K
Capitalization173.32M
Ivanhoe Mines
Price$10.14
Change+$0.26 (+2.63%)
Volume$247.85K
Capitalization13.73B
GLATF vs IVPAF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GLATF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IVPAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GLATF vs. IVPAF commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLATF is a Hold and IVPAF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (GLATF: $0.51 vs. IVPAF: $10.14)
Brand notoriety: GLATF and IVPAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GLATF: 102% vs. IVPAF: 84%
Market capitalization -- GLATF: $173.32M vs. IVPAF: $13.73B
GLATF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $173.32M. IVPAF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $13.73B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GLATF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileIVPAF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GLATF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • IVPAF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GLATF is a better buy in the long-term than IVPAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GLATF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IVPAF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GLATF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • IVPAF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both GLATF and IVPAF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

GLATF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -2.38% price change this week, while IVPAF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +5.19% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +6.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +50.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +116.62%.

Reported Earning Dates

IVPAF is expected to report earnings on Nov 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+6.26% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IVPAF($13.7B) has a higher market cap than GLATF($173M). IVPAF has higher P/E ratio than GLATF: IVPAF (34.97) vs GLATF (28.13). GLATF YTD gains are higher at: -10.096 vs. IVPAF (-14.358). IVPAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 355M vs. GLATF (-7.35M). IVPAF has more cash in the bank: 655M vs. GLATF (25.8M). GLATF has less debt than IVPAF: GLATF (6.35M) vs IVPAF (1.17B). IVPAF has higher revenues than GLATF: IVPAF (215M) vs GLATF (805K).
GLATFIVPAFGLATF / IVPAF
Capitalization173M13.7B1%
EBITDA-7.35M355M-2%
Gain YTD-10.096-14.35870%
P/E Ratio28.1334.9780%
Revenue805K215M0%
Total Cash25.8M655M4%
Total Debt6.35M1.17B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GLATF vs IVPAF: Fundamental Ratings
GLATF
IVPAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
94
Overvalued
91
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10055
SMR RATING
1..100
9577
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4544
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1098
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IVPAF's Valuation (91) in the null industry is in the same range as GLATF (94). This means that IVPAF’s stock grew similarly to GLATF’s over the last 12 months.

IVPAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (55) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GLATF (100). This means that IVPAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GLATF’s over the last 12 months.

IVPAF's SMR Rating (77) in the null industry is in the same range as GLATF (95). This means that IVPAF’s stock grew similarly to GLATF’s over the last 12 months.

IVPAF's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as GLATF (45). This means that IVPAF’s stock grew similarly to GLATF’s over the last 12 months.

GLATF's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for IVPAF (98). This means that GLATF’s stock grew significantly faster than IVPAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GLATFIVPAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GLATF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IVPAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DNLI13.950.52
+3.87%
Denali Therapeutics
DLHC5.580.07
+1.27%
DLH Holdings Corp
VTRS9.520.03
+0.32%
Viatris
BSVN47.53-0.20
-0.42%
Bank7 Corp
AZTR0.70-0.02
-2.48%
Azitra

GLATF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GLATF has been loosely correlated with SYHBF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GLATF jumps, then SYHBF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GLATF
1D Price
Change %
GLATF100%
-3.88%
SYHBF - GLATF
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.89%
LTSRF - GLATF
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.07%
TECK - GLATF
25%
Poorly correlated
+3.68%
IVPAF - GLATF
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.63%
MTRN - GLATF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.22%
More

IVPAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IVPAF has been loosely correlated with GLNCY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IVPAF jumps, then GLNCY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IVPAF
1D Price
Change %
IVPAF100%
+2.63%
GLNCY - IVPAF
62%
Loosely correlated
+1.24%
GLCNF - IVPAF
57%
Loosely correlated
+2.71%
GMBXF - IVPAF
53%
Loosely correlated
+1.26%
BDNNY - IVPAF
49%
Loosely correlated
+1.01%
FMCXF - IVPAF
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.59%
More