GLATF
Price
$0.46
Change
+$0.06 (+15.00%)
Updated
Sep 8 closing price
Capitalization
152.47M
GLBXF
Price
$0.98
Change
-$0.01 (-1.01%)
Updated
Sep 8 closing price
Capitalization
55.12M
Interact to see
Advertisement

GLATF vs GLBXF

Header iconGLATF vs GLBXF Comparison
Open Charts GLATF vs GLBXFBanner chart's image
Global Atomic
Price$0.46
Change+$0.06 (+15.00%)
Volume$912.37K
Capitalization152.47M
Globex Mining Enterprises
Price$0.98
Change-$0.01 (-1.01%)
Volume$39.51K
Capitalization55.12M
GLATF vs GLBXF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GLATF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GLBXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GLATF vs. GLBXF commentary
Sep 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLATF is a Hold and GLBXF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 09, 2025
Stock price -- (GLATF: $0.46 vs. GLBXF: $0.98)
Brand notoriety: GLATF and GLBXF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GLATF: 246% vs. GLBXF: 131%
Market capitalization -- GLATF: $152.47M vs. GLBXF: $55.12M
GLATF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $152.47M. GLBXF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $55.12M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.3B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GLATF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGLBXF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GLATF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GLBXF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GLBXF is a better buy in the long-term than GLATF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GLATF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GLBXF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GLATF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • GLBXF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GLATF is a better buy in the short-term than GLBXF.

Price Growth

GLATF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +10.43% price change this week, while GLBXF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +0.41% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +5.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was +58.71%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+5.71% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLATF($152M) has a higher market cap than GLBXF($55.1M). GLBXF has higher P/E ratio than GLATF: GLBXF (136.19) vs GLATF (28.13). GLBXF YTD gains are higher at: 19.273 vs. GLATF (-18.934). GLBXF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -3.46M vs. GLATF (-7.35M). GLBXF has more cash in the bank: 31.6M vs. GLATF (25.8M). GLBXF has higher revenues than GLATF: GLBXF (982K) vs GLATF (805K).
GLATFGLBXFGLATF / GLBXF
Capitalization152M55.1M276%
EBITDA-7.35M-3.46M212%
Gain YTD-18.93419.273-98%
P/E Ratio28.13136.1921%
Revenue805K982K82%
Total Cash25.8M31.6M82%
Total Debt6.35MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GLATF vs GLBXF: Fundamental Ratings
GLATF
GLBXF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5411
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
94
Overvalued
90
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10059
SMR RATING
1..100
9591
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6551
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
113
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GLBXF's Valuation (90) in the null industry is in the same range as GLATF (94). This means that GLBXF’s stock grew similarly to GLATF’s over the last 12 months.

GLBXF's Profit vs Risk Rating (59) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GLATF (100). This means that GLBXF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GLATF’s over the last 12 months.

GLBXF's SMR Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as GLATF (95). This means that GLBXF’s stock grew similarly to GLATF’s over the last 12 months.

GLBXF's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as GLATF (65). This means that GLBXF’s stock grew similarly to GLATF’s over the last 12 months.

GLBXF's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the null industry is in the same range as GLATF (11). This means that GLBXF’s stock grew similarly to GLATF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GLATFGLBXF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GLATF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GLBXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EPVIX13.650.09
+0.66%
EuroPac International Value I
HCAYX59.200.17
+0.29%
Hartford Capital Appreciation Y
ARILX16.020.04
+0.25%
Aristotle Core Eq I
ASYLX15.900.01
+0.06%
AB Select US Long/Short Advisor
MSVVX13.50-0.03
-0.22%
MetLife Small Company Equity Investor

GLATF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GLATF has been loosely correlated with SYHBF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GLATF jumps, then SYHBF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GLATF
1D Price
Change %
GLATF100%
+13.57%
SYHBF - GLATF
46%
Loosely correlated
+1.90%
LTSRF - GLATF
30%
Poorly correlated
+6.32%
TECK - GLATF
25%
Poorly correlated
+2.33%
IVPAF - GLATF
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.99%
MTRN - GLATF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.47%
More

GLBXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GLBXF and AAGFF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GLBXF and AAGFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GLBXF
1D Price
Change %
GLBXF100%
-0.92%
AAGFF - GLBXF
23%
Poorly correlated
+3.04%
IVPAF - GLBXF
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.99%
GLCNF - GLBXF
19%
Poorly correlated
+0.26%
GLNCY - GLBXF
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GLATF - GLBXF
4%
Poorly correlated
+13.57%
More