GLASF
Price
$6.48
Change
-$0.03 (-0.46%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
503.33M
VRNOF
Price
$1.14
Change
-$0.02 (-1.72%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
416.51M
32 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

GLASF vs VRNOF

Header iconGLASF vs VRNOF Comparison
Open Charts GLASF vs VRNOFBanner chart's image
Glass House Brands
Price$6.48
Change-$0.03 (-0.46%)
Volume$88.56K
Capitalization503.33M
Verano Holdings
Price$1.14
Change-$0.02 (-1.72%)
Volume$448.57K
Capitalization416.51M
GLASF vs VRNOF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GLASF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VRNOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GLASF vs. VRNOF commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLASF is a Hold and VRNOF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (GLASF: $6.48 vs. VRNOF: $1.14)
Brand notoriety: GLASF and VRNOF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Pharmaceuticals: Generic industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GLASF: 42% vs. VRNOF: 42%
Market capitalization -- GLASF: $503.33M vs. VRNOF: $416.51M
GLASF [@Pharmaceuticals: Generic] is valued at $503.33M. VRNOF’s [@Pharmaceuticals: Generic] market capitalization is $416.51M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pharmaceuticals: Generic] industry ranges from $63.66B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pharmaceuticals: Generic] industry is $3.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GLASF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileVRNOF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GLASF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • VRNOF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, VRNOF is a better buy in the long-term than GLASF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GLASF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VRNOF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GLASF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • VRNOF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, VRNOF is a better buy in the short-term than GLASF.

Price Growth

GLASF (@Pharmaceuticals: Generic) experienced а -6.36% price change this week, while VRNOF (@Pharmaceuticals: Generic) price change was +2.70% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Generic industry was -1.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +24.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +66.99%.

Reported Earning Dates

VRNOF is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pharmaceuticals: Generic (-1.16% weekly)

A generic drug contains the same chemical substance as a drug that was originally protected by patents. Generic drugs are generally sold at cheaper price points, compared to name-brand pharmaceuticals, after patents for the more expensive drugs lapse. The generic drug industry has created a major market, thanks to the lower pricing. According to the Center for Justice and Democracy at New York Law School, 80 percent of all drugs prescribed are generic, and generic drugs are chosen 94 percent of the time when they are available. But their manufacturers must be able to prove to the FDA that they can be effective substitutes for the original drugs. Some of the major generic drug makers include Zoetis, Inc., Allergan plc and Mylan N.V.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLASF($503M) has a higher market cap than VRNOF($417M). GLASF YTD gains are higher at: 11.724 vs. VRNOF (-8.434). GLASF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 49M vs. VRNOF (-98.31M). VRNOF has more cash in the bank: 68.6M vs. GLASF (40.7M). GLASF has less debt than VRNOF: GLASF (72.8M) vs VRNOF (509M). VRNOF has higher revenues than GLASF: VRNOF (847M) vs GLASF (222M).
GLASFVRNOFGLASF / VRNOF
Capitalization503M417M121%
EBITDA49M-98.31M-50%
Gain YTD11.724-8.434-139%
P/E Ratio513.07N/A-
Revenue222M847M26%
Total Cash40.7M68.6M59%
Total Debt72.8M509M14%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GLASF: Fundamental Ratings
GLASF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
73
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
94
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
95
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
60
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GLASFVRNOF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GLASF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VRNOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SVTAX11.270.09
+0.81%
SEI Global Managed Volatility F (SIMT)
MUHLX73.870.58
+0.79%
Muhlenkamp
NMANX19.310.13
+0.68%
Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth Inv
JABLX55.180.13
+0.24%
Janus Henderson VIT Balanced Instl
RYICX119.29N/A
N/A
Rydex Internet C

GLASF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GLASF has been loosely correlated with TSNDF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GLASF jumps, then TSNDF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GLASF
1D Price
Change %
GLASF100%
-0.46%
TSNDF - GLASF
62%
Loosely correlated
-2.69%
GTBIF - GLASF
62%
Loosely correlated
-2.02%
TCNNF - GLASF
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.09%
VRNOF - GLASF
58%
Loosely correlated
-1.72%
CRLBF - GLASF
57%
Loosely correlated
-1.90%
More

VRNOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VRNOF has been closely correlated with GTBIF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if VRNOF jumps, then GTBIF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VRNOF
1D Price
Change %
VRNOF100%
-1.72%
GTBIF - VRNOF
79%
Closely correlated
-2.02%
CURLF - VRNOF
77%
Closely correlated
-7.35%
TCNNF - VRNOF
76%
Closely correlated
+1.09%
TSNDF - VRNOF
73%
Closely correlated
-2.69%
CRLBF - VRNOF
72%
Closely correlated
-1.90%
More