Advertisement
GLASF vs OHCFF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLASF is a Hold and OHCFF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GLASF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileOHCFF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- GLASF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- OHCFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GLASF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OHCFF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- GLASF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- OHCFF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
GLASF (@Pharmaceuticals: Generic) experienced а +2.94% price change this week, while OHCFF (@Services to the Health Industry) price change was +0.97% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Generic industry was +0.79%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.23%, and the average quarterly price growth was +51.45%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Services to the Health Industry industry was -2.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.40%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Pharmaceuticals: Generic (+0.79% weekly)A generic drug contains the same chemical substance as a drug that was originally protected by patents. Generic drugs are generally sold at cheaper price points, compared to name-brand pharmaceuticals, after patents for the more expensive drugs lapse. The generic drug industry has created a major market, thanks to the lower pricing. According to the Center for Justice and Democracy at New York Law School, 80 percent of all drugs prescribed are generic, and generic drugs are chosen 94 percent of the time when they are available. But their manufacturers must be able to prove to the FDA that they can be effective substitutes for the original drugs. Some of the major generic drug makers include Zoetis, Inc., Allergan plc and Mylan N.V.
@Services to the Health Industry (-2.80% weekly)This industry comprises companies that provide services, such as equipment sterilization, research, physician management systems and consulting, that support the healthcare/medical industry. Examples of such companies include Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, which operates one of the largest clinical laboratory networks in the world; Quest Diagnostics Inc., which is a clinical laboratory; and Syneos Health, which is a major clinical research organization.
| GLASF | OHCFF | GLASF / OHCFF | |
| Capitalization | 670M | 16.2M | 4,136% |
| EBITDA | 49M | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 44.655 | -24.944 | -179% |
| P/E Ratio | 513.07 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 222M | N/A | - |
| Total Cash | 40.7M | 9.42M | 432% |
| Total Debt | 72.8M | N/A | - |
GLASF | OHCFF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 26 | 52 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 94 Overvalued | 45 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 95 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 95 | 99 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 39 | 93 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 65 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
OHCFF's Valuation (45) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GLASF (94). This means that OHCFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GLASF’s over the last 12 months.
OHCFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (95) in the null industry is in the same range as GLASF (100). This means that OHCFF’s stock grew similarly to GLASF’s over the last 12 months.
GLASF's SMR Rating (95) in the null industry is in the same range as OHCFF (99). This means that GLASF’s stock grew similarly to OHCFF’s over the last 12 months.
GLASF's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OHCFF (93). This means that GLASF’s stock grew somewhat faster than OHCFF’s over the last 12 months.
OHCFF's P/E Growth Rating (65) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GLASF (100). This means that OHCFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GLASF’s over the last 12 months.
| GLASF | OHCFF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 72% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 39% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 62% |
Advertisement
GLASF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GLASF has been loosely correlated with TSNDF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GLASF jumps, then TSNDF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GLASF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GLASF | 100% | -4.33% | ||
| TSNDF - GLASF | 63% Loosely correlated | -6.25% | ||
| GTBIF - GLASF | 62% Loosely correlated | -3.22% | ||
| TCNNF - GLASF | 60% Loosely correlated | -4.83% | ||
| VRNOF - GLASF | 58% Loosely correlated | -3.38% | ||
| CURLF - GLASF | 57% Loosely correlated | -8.04% | ||
More | ||||
OHCFF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that OHCFF and SWDCF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OHCFF and SWDCF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To OHCFF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OHCFF | 100% | +5.84% | ||
| SWDCF - OHCFF | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| HYEX - OHCFF | 10% Poorly correlated | +9.29% | ||
| TKNO - OHCFF | 7% Poorly correlated | -2.47% | ||
| GLASF - OHCFF | 1% Poorly correlated | -4.33% | ||
| UPC - OHCFF | 1% Poorly correlated | -4.04% | ||
More | ||||