GLASF vs GTBIF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLASF is a Sell and GTBIF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GLASF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGTBIF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- GLASF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- GTBIF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Price Growth
GLASF (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) experienced а +2.44% price change this week, while GTBIF (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) price change was +0.45% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was +56.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.95%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Pharmaceuticals: Other (+56.20% weekly)Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.
| GLASF | GTBIF | GLASF / GTBIF | |
| Capitalization | 204M | 1.68B | 12% |
| EBITDA | -24.02M | 253M | -9% |
| Gain YTD | 68.922 | -17.697 | -389% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 172.41 | - |
| Revenue | 106M | 1.02B | 10% |
| Total Cash | 13.4M | 185M | 7% |
| Total Debt | 73.6M | 541M | 14% |
GTBIF | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 2 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 78 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 97 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 89 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 77 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 98 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| RSI ODDS (%) |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) |
| Momentum ODDS (%) |
| MACD ODDS (%) |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
| Advances ODDS (%) |
| Declines ODDS (%) |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
| Aroon ODDS (%) |
GLASF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GLASF has been loosely correlated with TSNDF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GLASF jumps, then TSNDF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GLASF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GLASF | 100% | -1.36% | ||
| TSNDF - GLASF | 62% Loosely correlated | -2.00% | ||
| GTBIF - GLASF | 62% Loosely correlated | -4.21% | ||
| TCNNF - GLASF | 58% Loosely correlated | -6.28% | ||
| VRNOF - GLASF | 58% Loosely correlated | -7.29% | ||
| CRLBF - GLASF | 57% Loosely correlated | -2.78% | ||
More | ||||
GTBIF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GTBIF has been closely correlated with CURLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GTBIF jumps, then CURLF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GTBIF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTBIF | 100% | -4.21% | ||
| CURLF - GTBIF | 82% Closely correlated | -1.79% | ||
| TCNNF - GTBIF | 82% Closely correlated | -6.28% | ||
| VRNOF - GTBIF | 79% Closely correlated | -7.29% | ||
| TSNDF - GTBIF | 77% Closely correlated | -2.00% | ||
| CRLBF - GTBIF | 71% Closely correlated | -2.78% | ||
More | ||||