GLAPY
Price
$71.00
Change
+$18.60 (+35.50%)
Updated
Jun 3 closing price
Capitalization
4.15B
45 days until earnings call
GPDNF
Price
$81.98
Change
-$0.17 (-0.21%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
39.27B
Interact to see
Advertisement

GLAPY vs GPDNF

Header iconGLAPY vs GPDNF Comparison
Open Charts GLAPY vs GPDNFBanner chart's image
Glanbia
Price$71.00
Change+$18.60 (+35.50%)
Volume$114
Capitalization4.15B
Danone
Price$81.98
Change-$0.17 (-0.21%)
Volume$396
Capitalization39.27B
GLAPY vs GPDNF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GLAPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GPDNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GLAPY vs. GPDNF commentary
Jun 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLAPY is a Buy and GPDNF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 29, 2025
Stock price -- (GLAPY: $71.00 vs. GPDNF: $81.98)
Brand notoriety: GLAPY and GPDNF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GLAPY: 26% vs. GPDNF: 9%
Market capitalization -- GLAPY: $4.15B vs. GPDNF: $39.27B
GLAPY [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $4.15B. GPDNF’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $39.27B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.42B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GLAPY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGPDNF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GLAPY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GPDNF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GLAPY is a better buy in the long-term than GPDNF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GLAPY’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GPDNF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GLAPY’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • GPDNF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GLAPY is a better buy in the short-term than GPDNF.

Price Growth

GLAPY (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while GPDNF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was -2.17% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.17%.

Reported Earning Dates

GLAPY is expected to report earnings on Aug 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (-0.38% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GPDNF($39.3B) has a higher market cap than GLAPY($4.15B). GPDNF has higher P/E ratio than GLAPY: GPDNF (37.74) vs GLAPY (19.61). GPDNF YTD gains are higher at: 24.118 vs. GLAPY (-2.951). GPDNF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4B vs. GLAPY (387M). GPDNF has more cash in the bank: 4.68B vs. GLAPY (439M). GLAPY has less debt than GPDNF: GLAPY (1.01B) vs GPDNF (14.2B). GPDNF has higher revenues than GLAPY: GPDNF (27.7B) vs GLAPY (5.64B).
GLAPYGPDNFGLAPY / GPDNF
Capitalization4.15B39.3B11%
EBITDA387M4B10%
Gain YTD-2.95124.118-12%
P/E Ratio19.6137.7452%
Revenue5.64B27.7B20%
Total Cash439M4.68B9%
Total Debt1.01B14.2B7%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GLAPY vs GPDNF: Fundamental Ratings
GLAPY
GPDNF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4728
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
47
Fair valued
36
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5567
SMR RATING
1..100
8798
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4048
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1594
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GPDNF's Valuation (36) in the null industry is in the same range as GLAPY (47). This means that GPDNF’s stock grew similarly to GLAPY’s over the last 12 months.

GLAPY's Profit vs Risk Rating (55) in the null industry is in the same range as GPDNF (67). This means that GLAPY’s stock grew similarly to GPDNF’s over the last 12 months.

GLAPY's SMR Rating (87) in the null industry is in the same range as GPDNF (98). This means that GLAPY’s stock grew similarly to GPDNF’s over the last 12 months.

GLAPY's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as GPDNF (48). This means that GLAPY’s stock grew similarly to GPDNF’s over the last 12 months.

GLAPY's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GPDNF (94). This means that GLAPY’s stock grew significantly faster than GPDNF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GLAPYGPDNF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
36%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
28%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
27%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
26%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GLAPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GPDNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EDRY9.640.53
+5.84%
EuroDry Ltd
SUNS11.290.18
+1.62%
Sunrise Realty Trust Inc.
EW78.211.06
+1.37%
Edwards Lifesciences Corp
FROG43.900.52
+1.21%
JFrog Ltd
CRAI187.031.02
+0.55%
CRA International

GLAPY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GLAPY and BRRLY have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GLAPY and BRRLY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GLAPY
1D Price
Change %
GLAPY100%
N/A
BRRLY - GLAPY
24%
Poorly correlated
+3.02%
GPDNF - GLAPY
9%
Poorly correlated
-0.21%
FTLF - GLAPY
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.16%
FPAFY - GLAPY
5%
Poorly correlated
-2.98%
GLUC - GLAPY
4%
Poorly correlated
-10.30%
More

GPDNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GPDNF has been loosely correlated with DANOY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GPDNF jumps, then DANOY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GPDNF
1D Price
Change %
GPDNF100%
-0.21%
DANOY - GPDNF
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.09%
NIPMY - GPDNF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NSRGY - GPDNF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.20%
NSRGF - GPDNF
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.17%
PAVS - GPDNF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More