GLAPF
Price
$16.81
Change
+$0.01 (+0.06%)
Updated
Sep 22 closing price
Capitalization
4.12B
GLUC
Price
$0.09
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
1.62M
Interact to see
Advertisement

GLAPF vs GLUC

Header iconGLAPF vs GLUC Comparison
Open Charts GLAPF vs GLUCBanner chart's image
Glanbia
Price$16.81
Change+$0.01 (+0.06%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization4.12B
Glucose Health
Price$0.09
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$5.6K
Capitalization1.62M
GLAPF vs GLUC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GLAPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GLUC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GLAPF vs. GLUC commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLAPF is a Hold and GLUC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (GLAPF: $16.81 vs. GLUC: $0.09)
Brand notoriety: GLAPF and GLUC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Major Diversified industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GLAPF: 165% vs. GLUC: 80%
Market capitalization -- GLAPF: $4.12B vs. GLUC: $1.62M
GLAPF [@Food: Major Diversified] is valued at $4.12B. GLUC’s [@Food: Major Diversified] market capitalization is $1.62M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry ranges from $229.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry is $6.85B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GLAPF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGLUC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GLAPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GLUC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GLAPF is a better buy in the long-term than GLUC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GLAPF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GLUC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GLAPF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • GLUC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GLUC is a better buy in the short-term than GLAPF.

Price Growth

GLAPF (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а +0.08% price change this week, while GLUC (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was -2.59% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was -1.98%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was +183.97%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Major Diversified (-1.98% weekly)

Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLAPF($4.12B) has a higher market cap than GLUC($1.62M). GLAPF YTD gains are higher at: 21.048 vs. GLUC (-22.667). GLAPF has more cash in the bank: 276M vs. GLUC (46.2K). GLUC has less debt than GLAPF: GLUC (431K) vs GLAPF (1.04B).
GLAPFGLUCGLAPF / GLUC
Capitalization4.12B1.62M254,889%
EBITDA399MN/A-
Gain YTD21.048-22.667-93%
P/E Ratio35.77N/A-
Revenue3.95BN/A-
Total Cash276M46.2K597,403%
Total Debt1.04B431K240,603%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GLAPF vs GLUC: Fundamental Ratings
GLAPF
GLUC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9186
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
44
Fair valued
56
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
57100
SMR RATING
1..100
89100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4762
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
84
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GLAPF's Valuation (44) in the null industry is in the same range as GLUC (56). This means that GLAPF’s stock grew similarly to GLUC’s over the last 12 months.

GLAPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (57) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GLUC (100). This means that GLAPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GLUC’s over the last 12 months.

GLAPF's SMR Rating (89) in the null industry is in the same range as GLUC (100). This means that GLAPF’s stock grew similarly to GLUC’s over the last 12 months.

GLAPF's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as GLUC (62). This means that GLAPF’s stock grew similarly to GLUC’s over the last 12 months.

GLUC's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is in the same range as GLAPF (8). This means that GLUC’s stock grew similarly to GLAPF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GLAPFGLUC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
19%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
22%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
31%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GLAPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GLUC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PXE30.190.20
+0.67%
Invesco Energy Exploration & Prod ETF
EFRA33.86N/A
N/A
iShares Environmental Infras & IndstrETF
OMAH19.44-0.01
-0.05%
Vistashares Target 15 Berkshire Select Income ETF
AGGH20.63-0.01
-0.05%
Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF
USPX57.85-0.19
-0.32%
Franklin US Equity Index ETF

GLAPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GLAPF and UVRBF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GLAPF and UVRBF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GLAPF
1D Price
Change %
GLAPF100%
N/A
UVRBF - GLAPF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FPAFY - GLAPF
9%
Poorly correlated
-2.82%
GRBMF - GLAPF
5%
Poorly correlated
+2.74%
HLNFF - GLAPF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GLAPY - GLAPF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

GLUC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GLUC and GUZOF have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GLUC and GUZOF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GLUC
1D Price
Change %
GLUC100%
+0.11%
GUZOF - GLUC
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GRBMF - GLUC
5%
Poorly correlated
+2.74%
GLAPY - GLUC
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HLNFF - GLUC
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GLAPF - GLUC
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More