GLAE
Price
$30.00
Change
+$5.00 (+20.00%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
226.53K
ICMB
Price
$2.75
Change
+$0.02 (+0.73%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
44.78M
72 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

GLAE vs ICMB

Header iconGLAE vs ICMB Comparison
Open Charts GLAE vs ICMBBanner chart's image
GlassBridge Enterprises
Price$30.00
Change+$5.00 (+20.00%)
Volume$3
Capitalization226.53K
Investcorp Credit Management BDC
Price$2.75
Change+$0.02 (+0.73%)
Volume$8.53K
Capitalization44.78M
GLAE vs ICMB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GLAE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ICMB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GLAE vs. ICMB commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLAE is a Hold and ICMB is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (GLAE: $30.00 vs. ICMB: $2.75)
Brand notoriety: GLAE and ICMB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GLAE: 147% vs. ICMB: 28%
Market capitalization -- GLAE: $226.53K vs. ICMB: $44.78M
GLAE [@Investment Managers] is valued at $226.53K. ICMB’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $44.78M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $6.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GLAE’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileICMB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GLAE’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • ICMB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GLAE is a better buy in the long-term than ICMB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GLAE’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ICMB’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GLAE’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • ICMB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GLAE is a better buy in the short-term than ICMB.

Price Growth

GLAE (@Investment Managers) experienced а +20.00% price change this week, while ICMB (@Investment Managers) price change was -2.14% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +2.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.30%.

Reported Earning Dates

ICMB is expected to report earnings on Sep 16, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+2.13% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ICMB($44.8M) has a higher market cap than GLAE($227K). ICMB has higher P/E ratio than GLAE: ICMB (16.00) vs GLAE (0.19). ICMB YTD gains are higher at: -1.705 vs. GLAE (-6.250). ICMB has more cash in the bank: 3.09M vs. GLAE (600K). GLAE has less debt than ICMB: GLAE (3.8M) vs ICMB (134M). ICMB has higher revenues than GLAE: ICMB (796K) vs GLAE (200K).
GLAEICMBGLAE / ICMB
Capitalization227K44.8M1%
EBITDA-3MN/A-
Gain YTD-6.250-1.705367%
P/E Ratio0.1916.001%
Revenue200K796K25%
Total Cash600K3.09M19%
Total Debt3.8M134M3%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GLAE vs ICMB: Fundamental Ratings
GLAE
ICMB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
74
Overvalued
1
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10056
SMR RATING
1..100
9776
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4359
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
370
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ICMB's Valuation (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GLAE (74). This means that ICMB’s stock grew significantly faster than GLAE’s over the last 12 months.

ICMB's Profit vs Risk Rating (56) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GLAE (100). This means that ICMB’s stock grew somewhat faster than GLAE’s over the last 12 months.

ICMB's SMR Rating (76) in the null industry is in the same range as GLAE (97). This means that ICMB’s stock grew similarly to GLAE’s over the last 12 months.

GLAE's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as ICMB (59). This means that GLAE’s stock grew similarly to ICMB’s over the last 12 months.

GLAE's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for ICMB (70). This means that GLAE’s stock grew significantly faster than ICMB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GLAEICMB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
46%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GLAE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ICMB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CLRO10.000.25
+2.56%
ClearOne Inc
NWN41.280.54
+1.33%
Northwest Natural Holding Company
TRNO57.160.48
+0.85%
Terreno Realty Corp
ABEO5.890.02
+0.34%
Abeona Therapeutics
ADBE379.310.84
+0.22%
Adobe

GLAE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GLAE and ICMB have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GLAE and ICMB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GLAE
1D Price
Change %
GLAE100%
N/A
ICMB - GLAE
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.73%
FNNCF - GLAE
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.75%
FRMO - GLAE
15%
Poorly correlated
+0.12%
FFXXF - GLAE
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HALFF - GLAE
0%
Poorly correlated
-0.34%
More

ICMB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ICMB has been loosely correlated with CION. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ICMB jumps, then CION could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ICMB
1D Price
Change %
ICMB100%
+0.73%
CION - ICMB
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.61%
PTMN - ICMB
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.08%
NMFC - ICMB
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PNNT - ICMB
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.87%
LRFC - ICMB
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.48%
More