GLAD
Price
$22.22
Change
-$0.26 (-1.16%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
496.17M
MFIC
Price
$12.05
Change
-$0.09 (-0.74%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
1.12B
40 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

GLAD vs MFIC

Header iconGLAD vs MFIC Comparison
Open Charts GLAD vs MFICBanner chart's image
Gladstone Capital
Price$22.22
Change-$0.26 (-1.16%)
Volume$190.35K
Capitalization496.17M
MidCap Financial Investment
Price$12.05
Change-$0.09 (-0.74%)
Volume$563.36K
Capitalization1.12B
GLAD vs MFIC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GLAD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MFIC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GLAD vs. MFIC commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLAD is a StrongBuy and MFIC is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (GLAD: $22.22 vs. MFIC: $12.05)
Brand notoriety: GLAD and MFIC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GLAD: 126% vs. MFIC: 134%
Market capitalization -- GLAD: $496.17M vs. MFIC: $1.12B
GLAD [@Investment Managers] is valued at $496.17M. MFIC’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $1.12B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $179.08B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.43B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GLAD’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMFIC’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s).

  • GLAD’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MFIC’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
According to our system of comparison, both GLAD and MFIC are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GLAD’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MFIC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GLAD’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • MFIC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GLAD is a better buy in the short-term than MFIC.

Price Growth

GLAD (@Investment Managers) experienced а -4.85% price change this week, while MFIC (@Investment Managers) price change was -2.59% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -1.95%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +39.07%.

Reported Earning Dates

MFIC is expected to report earnings on Nov 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-1.95% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MFIC($1.12B) has a higher market cap than GLAD($496M). MFIC has higher P/E ratio than GLAD: MFIC (11.48) vs GLAD (6.55). MFIC YTD gains are higher at: -2.389 vs. GLAD (-17.094). MFIC has more cash in the bank: 16.5M vs. GLAD (9.33M). GLAD has less debt than MFIC: GLAD (282M) vs MFIC (2.05B).
GLADMFICGLAD / MFIC
Capitalization496M1.12B44%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-17.094-2.389715%
P/E Ratio6.5511.4857%
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total Cash9.33M16.5M57%
Total Debt282M2.05B14%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GLAD vs MFIC: Fundamental Ratings
GLAD
MFIC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
471
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
10
Undervalued
3
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2422
SMR RATING
1..100
4032
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6461
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4815
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MFIC's Valuation (3) in the null industry is in the same range as GLAD (10). This means that MFIC’s stock grew similarly to GLAD’s over the last 12 months.

MFIC's Profit vs Risk Rating (22) in the null industry is in the same range as GLAD (24). This means that MFIC’s stock grew similarly to GLAD’s over the last 12 months.

MFIC's SMR Rating (32) in the null industry is in the same range as GLAD (40). This means that MFIC’s stock grew similarly to GLAD’s over the last 12 months.

MFIC's Price Growth Rating (61) in the null industry is in the same range as GLAD (64). This means that MFIC’s stock grew similarly to GLAD’s over the last 12 months.

MFIC's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GLAD (48). This means that MFIC’s stock grew somewhat faster than GLAD’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GLADMFIC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
54%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
46%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GLAD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MFIC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JVARX39.990.38
+0.96%
JPMorgan Value Advantage R5
NWALX36.950.29
+0.79%
Nationwide BNY Mellon Dyn US Eq Inc A
GCEJX10.180.06
+0.59%
Goldman Sachs Clean Energy Income Inv
HDDVX18.460.08
+0.44%
Janus Henderson International Div D
BGIFX15.220.01
+0.04%
Baillie Gifford International Alpha 3

GLAD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GLAD has been closely correlated with BENF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GLAD jumps, then BENF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GLAD
1D Price
Change %
GLAD100%
-1.16%
BENF - GLAD
87%
Closely correlated
+4.11%
ARCC - GLAD
72%
Closely correlated
-0.49%
MAIN - GLAD
72%
Closely correlated
+0.05%
MFIC - GLAD
71%
Closely correlated
-0.74%
OBDC - GLAD
70%
Closely correlated
-0.97%
More

MFIC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MFIC has been closely correlated with OBDC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MFIC jumps, then OBDC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MFIC
1D Price
Change %
MFIC100%
-0.74%
OBDC - MFIC
79%
Closely correlated
-0.97%
GBDC - MFIC
78%
Closely correlated
+0.29%
ARCC - MFIC
77%
Closely correlated
-0.49%
BCSF - MFIC
75%
Closely correlated
-0.42%
SLRC - MFIC
75%
Closely correlated
-0.64%
More