Advertisement
GLABF vs QCLS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLABF is a Hold and QCLS is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GLABF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileQCLS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- GLABF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- QCLS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GLABF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QCLS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- GLABF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 5 bearish.
- QCLS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
Price Growth
GLABF (@Biotechnology) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while QCLS (@Computer Processing Hardware) price change was -2.46% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Biotechnology industry was +0.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +17.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +81.94%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Processing Hardware industry was +1.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +20.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +113.14%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Biotechnology (+0.44% weekly)Biotechnology involves genetic or protein engineering to produce medicines/therapies for treating and preventing ailments. The industry also provides crucial ingredients for diagnostics. This multi-billion-dollar industry is heavily focused on research and development, as companies attempt to continually come up with cutting-edge solutions for health. New discoveries for the treatment of diseases provide opportunities for growth for a company in this industry. Discoveries, however, must pass the regulatory approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) before they can make it to markets. Amgen Inc., Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Celgene Corporation are examples of companies in this industry.
@Computer Processing Hardware (+1.80% weekly)Computer Processing Hardware industry produces central processing unit, monitor, keyboard, computer data storage devices, and graphics card. Business activity and economic growth are potential drivers of this industry – if more businesses are growing or flourishing, so would their investments in computer equipment. Dell Technologies, Inc, Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co., NCR Corporation are key producers of computer processing hardware.
| GLABF | QCLS | GLABF / QCLS | |
| Capitalization | 24.6M | 8.05M | 305% |
| EBITDA | -3.24M | -8.36M | 39% |
| Gain YTD | -41.347 | -96.209 | 43% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 10.9K | 0 | - |
| Total Cash | -167 | 208K | -0% |
| Total Debt | 241K | 0 | - |
QCLS | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 86 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 35 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 96 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 24 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| GLABF | QCLS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 64% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 65% | 3 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 60% | 3 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 41% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 38% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 7 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 64% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 75% |
Advertisement
GLABF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GLABF has been loosely correlated with ELVAF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GLABF jumps, then ELVAF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GLABF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GLABF | 100% | N/A | ||
| ELVAF - GLABF | 36% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| QCLS - GLABF | 29% Poorly correlated | +12.08% | ||
| IDRSF - GLABF | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| VYGR - GLABF | 22% Poorly correlated | +1.94% | ||
| ENTO - GLABF | 8% Poorly correlated | -4.09% | ||
More | ||||
QCLS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QCLS has been loosely correlated with ARTV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QCLS jumps, then ARTV could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QCLS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QCLS | 100% | +12.08% | ||
| ARTV - QCLS | 47% Loosely correlated | +4.74% | ||
| COGT - QCLS | 39% Loosely correlated | -4.72% | ||
| PHAT - QCLS | 39% Loosely correlated | -0.40% | ||
| TVGN - QCLS | 36% Loosely correlated | -1.71% | ||
| LRMR - QCLS | 32% Poorly correlated | -8.24% | ||
More | ||||