GL
Price
$133.16
Change
-$0.81 (-0.60%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
10.6B
82 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
UNM
Price
$77.00
Change
-$0.34 (-0.44%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
12.88B
81 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GL vs UNM

Header iconGL vs UNM Comparison
Open Charts GL vs UNMBanner chart's image
Globe Life
Price$133.16
Change-$0.81 (-0.60%)
Volume$487.35K
Capitalization10.6B
Unum Group
Price$77.00
Change-$0.34 (-0.44%)
Volume$1.14M
Capitalization12.88B
GL vs UNM Comparison Chart in %
GL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
UNM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GL vs. UNM commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GL is a StrongBuy and UNM is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (GL: $133.16 vs. UNM: $77.00)
Brand notoriety: GL and UNM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Life/Health Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GL: 83% vs. UNM: 86%
Market capitalization -- GL: $10.6B vs. UNM: $12.88B
GL [@Life/Health Insurance] is valued at $10.6B. UNM’s [@Life/Health Insurance] market capitalization is $12.88B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry ranges from $158.03B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry is $27.06B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileUNM’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • GL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • UNM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, UNM is a better buy in the long-term than GL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GL’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UNM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • UNM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GL is a better buy in the short-term than UNM.

Price Growth

GL (@Life/Health Insurance) experienced а +1.01% price change this week, while UNM (@Life/Health Insurance) price change was +0.29% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Life/Health Insurance industry was +1.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.11%.

Reported Earning Dates

GL is expected to report earnings on Feb 04, 2026.

UNM is expected to report earnings on Feb 03, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Life/Health Insurance (+1.09% weekly)

Life insurance companies mainly sell policies that pay a death benefit as a lump sum upon the death of the insured to their beneficiaries. Life insurance policies may be sold as term life, (which guarantees payment of a stated death benefit and expires at the end of a specified term) or permanent /typically whole life (which is more expensive but lasts a lifetime and carries a cash accumulation component). Life insurance firms may also sell long-term disability policies that help to replace the insured individual’s income if they become sick or disabled. Health insurance, on the other hand, helps pay for medical expenses. Anthem, Inc., MetLife, Inc. and Aflac Incorporated are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
UNM($12.9B) has a higher market cap than GL($10.6B). UNM has higher P/E ratio than GL: UNM (14.89) vs GL (9.66). GL YTD gains are higher at: 21.141 vs. UNM (8.332). GL has less debt than UNM: GL (2.79B) vs UNM (3.74B). UNM has higher revenues than GL: UNM (13B) vs GL (5.87B).
GLUNMGL / UNM
Capitalization10.6B12.9B82%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD21.1418.332254%
P/E Ratio9.6614.8965%
Revenue5.87B13B45%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt2.79B3.74B75%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GL vs UNM: Fundamental Ratings
GL
UNM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
477
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
76
Overvalued
45
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
574
SMR RATING
1..100
8594
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5353
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
378
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

UNM's Valuation (45) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as GL (76) in the null industry. This means that UNM’s stock grew similarly to GL’s over the last 12 months.

UNM's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GL (57) in the null industry. This means that UNM’s stock grew somewhat faster than GL’s over the last 12 months.

GL's SMR Rating (85) in the null industry is in the same range as UNM (94) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry. This means that GL’s stock grew similarly to UNM’s over the last 12 months.

GL's Price Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as UNM (53) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry. This means that GL’s stock grew similarly to UNM’s over the last 12 months.

UNM's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as GL (37) in the null industry. This means that UNM’s stock grew similarly to GL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GLUNM
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
41%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 30 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
45%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
UNM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PPH99.331.13
+1.15%
VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF
THRO38.66-0.02
-0.05%
iShares U.S. Thematic Rotation ActiveETF
IBMS25.98-0.02
-0.06%
iShares iBonds Dec 2030 Term Mun Bd ETF
OMFS43.65-0.06
-0.13%
Invesco Russell 2000® Dynamic Mltfct ETF
RPHS11.31-0.02
-0.22%
Regents Park Hedged Market Strategy ETF

GL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GL has been closely correlated with PRI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GL jumps, then PRI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GL
1D Price
Change %
GL100%
+1.25%
PRI - GL
72%
Closely correlated
+1.27%
CNO - GL
70%
Closely correlated
+1.59%
MET - GL
67%
Closely correlated
+3.11%
AFL - GL
66%
Closely correlated
+0.72%
UNM - GL
65%
Loosely correlated
+1.32%
More

UNM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UNM has been closely correlated with CNO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if UNM jumps, then CNO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UNM
1D Price
Change %
UNM100%
+1.32%
CNO - UNM
67%
Closely correlated
+1.59%
MET - UNM
66%
Closely correlated
+3.11%
PRI - UNM
66%
Closely correlated
+1.27%
GL - UNM
63%
Loosely correlated
+1.25%
PRU - UNM
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.98%
More