GJNSY
Price
$28.09
Change
+$1.42 (+5.32%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
13.78B
HCXLF
Price
$17.00
Change
-$1.00 (-5.56%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
5.82B
58 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

GJNSY vs HCXLF

Header iconGJNSY vs HCXLF Comparison
Open Charts GJNSY vs HCXLFBanner chart's image
Gjensidige Forsikring Asa
Price$28.09
Change+$1.42 (+5.32%)
Volume$2.56K
Capitalization13.78B
Hiscox
Price$17.00
Change-$1.00 (-5.56%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization5.82B
GJNSY vs HCXLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GJNSY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HCXLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GJNSY vs. HCXLF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GJNSY is a Hold and HCXLF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (GJNSY: $28.09 vs. HCXLF: $16.86)
Brand notoriety: GJNSY and HCXLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Property/Casualty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GJNSY: 188% vs. HCXLF: 99%
Market capitalization -- GJNSY: $13.78B vs. HCXLF: $5.82B
GJNSY [@Property/Casualty Insurance] is valued at $13.78B. HCXLF’s [@Property/Casualty Insurance] market capitalization is $5.82B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $143B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $17.89B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GJNSY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHCXLF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • GJNSY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HCXLF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, HCXLF is a better buy in the long-term than GJNSY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GJNSY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HCXLF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GJNSY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • HCXLF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GJNSY is a better buy in the short-term than HCXLF.

Price Growth

GJNSY (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а +1.26% price change this week, while HCXLF (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was +0.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.05%.

Reported Earning Dates

HCXLF is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Property/Casualty Insurance (+0.22% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GJNSY($13.8B) has a higher market cap than HCXLF($5.82B). GJNSY has higher P/E ratio than HCXLF: GJNSY (22.07) vs HCXLF (9.97). GJNSY YTD gains are higher at: 68.934 vs. HCXLF (23.937). GJNSY has more cash in the bank: 4.1B vs. HCXLF (1.31B). HCXLF has less debt than GJNSY: HCXLF (875M) vs GJNSY (5.35B). GJNSY has higher revenues than HCXLF: GJNSY (43.5B) vs HCXLF (3.84B).
GJNSYHCXLFGJNSY / HCXLF
Capitalization13.8B5.82B237%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD68.93423.937288%
P/E Ratio22.079.97221%
Revenue43.5B3.84B1,132%
Total Cash4.1B1.31B312%
Total Debt5.35B875M611%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GJNSY vs HCXLF: Fundamental Ratings
GJNSY
HCXLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5749
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
48
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3220
SMR RATING
1..100
9270
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4553
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6026
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8585

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HCXLF's Valuation (48) in the null industry is in the same range as GJNSY (72). This means that HCXLF’s stock grew similarly to GJNSY’s over the last 12 months.

HCXLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the null industry is in the same range as GJNSY (32). This means that HCXLF’s stock grew similarly to GJNSY’s over the last 12 months.

HCXLF's SMR Rating (70) in the null industry is in the same range as GJNSY (92). This means that HCXLF’s stock grew similarly to GJNSY’s over the last 12 months.

GJNSY's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as HCXLF (53). This means that GJNSY’s stock grew similarly to HCXLF’s over the last 12 months.

HCXLF's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GJNSY (60). This means that HCXLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GJNSY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GJNSYHCXLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
27%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
32%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
30%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
31%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
58%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
36%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GJNSY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HCXLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CEE16.260.36
+2.26%
Central and Eastern Europe Fund (The)
GCAD43.410.37
+0.87%
Gabelli Commercial Aerospace & Dfns ETF
NMB24.630.09
+0.37%
Simplify National Muni Bond ETF
BTAL16.09-0.04
-0.25%
AGF U.S. Market Neutral Anti-Beta
RDVI25.55-0.09
-0.35%
FT Vest Ris Div Ach Trg Inc ETF

GJNSY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GJNSY and AMIGY have been poorly correlated (+14% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GJNSY and AMIGY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GJNSY
1D Price
Change %
GJNSY100%
+5.32%
AMIGY - GJNSY
14%
Poorly correlated
+1.04%
AMIGF - GJNSY
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PLMR - GJNSY
-2%
Poorly correlated
-2.40%
GJNSF - GJNSY
-3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HCXLF - GJNSY
-5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

HCXLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HCXLF and PLMR have been poorly correlated (+3% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HCXLF and PLMR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HCXLF
1D Price
Change %
HCXLF100%
N/A
PLMR - HCXLF
3%
Poorly correlated
-2.40%
GJNSF - HCXLF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AMIGF - HCXLF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AMIGY - HCXLF
-1%
Poorly correlated
+1.04%
GJNSY - HCXLF
-5%
Poorly correlated
+5.32%
More