Advertisement
GJNSF vs LMND
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GJNSF is a Hold and LMND is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GJNSF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLMND’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- GJNSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- LMND’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LMND’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- LMND’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
GJNSF (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while LMND (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was -5.08% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was +0.59%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.53%.
Reported Earning Dates
LMND is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Property/Casualty Insurance (+0.59% weekly)Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.
| GJNSF | LMND | GJNSF / LMND | |
| Capitalization | 7.91B | 1.16B | 680% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.000 | 14.667 | - |
| P/E Ratio | 14.10 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 37.5B | 430M | 8,721% |
| Total Cash | 4.16B | 938M | 443% |
| Total Debt | 3.82B | 43.1M | 8,854% |
GJNSF | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 39 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 95 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 94 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 55 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 60 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 30 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| GJNSF | LMND | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 81% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 89% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 25% | 4 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 22% | 4 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 11 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 18 days ago 85% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 86% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| SARK | 35.96 | 0.56 | +1.58% |
| Tradr 1X Short Innovation Daily ETF | |||
| FNDX | 24.45 | 0.08 | +0.33% |
| Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large CompanyETF | |||
| BSMT | 22.70 | 0.02 | +0.07% |
| Invesco BulletShares 2029 Muncpl Bd ETF | |||
| EUSB | 43.41 | -0.08 | -0.19% |
| iShares ESG Advanced Ttl USD Bd Mrkt ETF | |||
| SZK | 11.93 | -0.11 | -0.91% |
| ProShares UltraShort Consumer Staples | |||
GJNSF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GJNSF has been loosely correlated with COFAF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GJNSF jumps, then COFAF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GJNSF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GJNSF | 100% | N/A | ||
| COFAF - GJNSF | 33% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| SZCRF - GJNSF | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| LMND - GJNSF | 2% Poorly correlated | -1.73% | ||
| AMIGF - GJNSF | 2% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| HCXLF - GJNSF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
LMND and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LMND has been loosely correlated with ROOT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LMND jumps, then ROOT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LMND | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LMND | 100% | -1.73% | ||
| ROOT - LMND | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.35% | ||
| KMPR - LMND | 44% Loosely correlated | -0.26% | ||
| UFCS - LMND | 43% Loosely correlated | +0.18% | ||
| BNT - LMND | 42% Loosely correlated | +1.04% | ||
| L - LMND | 40% Loosely correlated | +0.40% | ||
More | ||||