GJNSF
Price
$17.52
Change
+$2.12 (+13.77%)
Updated
Nov 26 closing price
Capitalization
14.29B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
LMND
Price
$74.11
Change
-$8.58 (-10.38%)
Updated
Feb 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
6.18B
15 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GJNSF vs LMND

Header iconGJNSF vs LMND Comparison
Open Charts GJNSF vs LMNDBanner chart's image
Gjensidige Forsikring Asa
Price$17.52
Change+$2.12 (+13.77%)
Volume$800
Capitalization14.29B
Lemonade
Price$74.11
Change-$8.58 (-10.38%)
Volume$6.82K
Capitalization6.18B
GJNSF vs LMND Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GJNSF vs. LMND commentary
Feb 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GJNSF is a Hold and LMND is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 05, 2026
Stock price -- (GJNSF: $17.52 vs. LMND: $82.69)
Brand notoriety: GJNSF and LMND are both not notable
Both companies represent the Property/Casualty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GJNSF: 100% vs. LMND: 145%
Market capitalization -- GJNSF: $14.29B vs. LMND: $6.18B
GJNSF [@Property/Casualty Insurance] is valued at $14.29B. LMND’s [@Property/Casualty Insurance] market capitalization is $6.18B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $123.33B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $17.29B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GJNSF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLMND’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GJNSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LMND’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GJNSF is a better buy in the long-term than LMND.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LMND’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • LMND’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

GJNSF (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while LMND (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was -5.77% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was +1.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.08%.

Reported Earning Dates

LMND is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Property/Casualty Insurance (+1.81% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GJNSF($14.3B) has a higher market cap than LMND($6.18B). LMND YTD gains are higher at: 16.170 vs. GJNSF (0.000). GJNSF has more cash in the bank: 5.18B vs. LMND (587M). LMND has less debt than GJNSF: LMND (152M) vs GJNSF (5.36B). GJNSF has higher revenues than LMND: GJNSF (43.8B) vs LMND (659M).
GJNSFLMNDGJNSF / LMND
Capitalization14.3B6.18B231%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD0.00016.170-
P/E Ratio19.31N/A-
Revenue43.8B659M6,646%
Total Cash5.18B587M883%
Total Debt5.36B152M3,527%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GJNSF: Fundamental Ratings
GJNSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
47
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
46
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
90
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
71
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
55
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
20

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GJNSFLMND
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
20%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
18%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LMND
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NFRA62.690.74
+1.19%
FlexShares STOXX Global Broad Infras ETF
EEMX46.530.26
+0.57%
State Street® SPDR®MSCIEMFsslFlRsrvFrETF
CPSR25.33N/A
N/A
Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - March
ISHP39.86N/A
N/A
First Trust S-Network Glb E-Com ETF
CFO76.22-0.15
-0.19%
VictoryShares US 500 Enh Vol Wtd ETF

GJNSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GJNSF and GJNSY have been poorly correlated (+2% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GJNSF and GJNSY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GJNSF
1D Price
Change %
GJNSF100%
N/A
GJNSY - GJNSF
2%
Poorly correlated
+0.98%
LMND - GJNSF
2%
Poorly correlated
+2.63%
AMIGY - GJNSF
2%
Poorly correlated
-1.12%
HCXLF - GJNSF
-0%
Poorly correlated
+15.61%
AMIGF - GJNSF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

LMND and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LMND has been loosely correlated with ROOT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LMND jumps, then ROOT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LMND
1D Price
Change %
LMND100%
+2.63%
ROOT - LMND
58%
Loosely correlated
-3.10%
HIPO - LMND
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.20%
BNT - LMND
43%
Loosely correlated
-4.54%
UFCS - LMND
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.44%
TRUP - LMND
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.69%
More