GJNSF
Price
$17.52
Change
+$2.12 (+13.77%)
Updated
Nov 26 closing price
Capitalization
13.51B
HCXLF
Price
$17.00
Change
-$1.00 (-5.56%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
5.82B
60 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

GJNSF vs HCXLF

Header iconGJNSF vs HCXLF Comparison
Open Charts GJNSF vs HCXLFBanner chart's image
Gjensidige Forsikring Asa
Price$17.52
Change+$2.12 (+13.77%)
Volume$800
Capitalization13.51B
Hiscox
Price$17.00
Change-$1.00 (-5.56%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization5.82B
GJNSF vs HCXLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HCXLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GJNSF vs. HCXLF commentary
Sep 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GJNSF is a Hold and HCXLF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 04, 2025
Stock price -- (GJNSF: $17.52 vs. HCXLF: $16.86)
Brand notoriety: GJNSF and HCXLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Property/Casualty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GJNSF: 100% vs. HCXLF: 97%
Market capitalization -- GJNSF: $13.51B vs. HCXLF: $5.82B
GJNSF [@Property/Casualty Insurance] is valued at $13.51B. HCXLF’s [@Property/Casualty Insurance] market capitalization is $5.82B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $144.68B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $17.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GJNSF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHCXLF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • GJNSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • HCXLF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, HCXLF is a better buy in the long-term than GJNSF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HCXLF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • HCXLF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.

Price Growth

GJNSF (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while HCXLF (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was +0.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.10%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.93%.

Reported Earning Dates

HCXLF is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Property/Casualty Insurance (+0.53% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GJNSF($13.5B) has a higher market cap than HCXLF($5.82B). GJNSF has higher P/E ratio than HCXLF: GJNSF (19.31) vs HCXLF (9.97). HCXLF YTD gains are higher at: 23.937 vs. GJNSF (0.000). GJNSF has more cash in the bank: 4.1B vs. HCXLF (1.31B). HCXLF has less debt than GJNSF: HCXLF (875M) vs GJNSF (5.35B). GJNSF has higher revenues than HCXLF: GJNSF (43.5B) vs HCXLF (3.84B).
GJNSFHCXLFGJNSF / HCXLF
Capitalization13.5B5.82B232%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD0.00023.937-
P/E Ratio19.319.97194%
Revenue43.5B3.84B1,132%
Total Cash4.1B1.31B312%
Total Debt5.35B875M611%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GJNSF vs HCXLF: Fundamental Ratings
GJNSF
HCXLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4749
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
36
Fair valued
47
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10020
SMR RATING
1..100
9170
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5653
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5426
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GJNSF's Valuation (36) in the null industry is in the same range as HCXLF (47). This means that GJNSF’s stock grew similarly to HCXLF’s over the last 12 months.

HCXLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GJNSF (100). This means that HCXLF’s stock grew significantly faster than GJNSF’s over the last 12 months.

HCXLF's SMR Rating (70) in the null industry is in the same range as GJNSF (91). This means that HCXLF’s stock grew similarly to GJNSF’s over the last 12 months.

HCXLF's Price Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as GJNSF (56). This means that HCXLF’s stock grew similarly to GJNSF’s over the last 12 months.

HCXLF's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the null industry is in the same range as GJNSF (54). This means that HCXLF’s stock grew similarly to GJNSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GJNSFHCXLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
27%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
32%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
33%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
22%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
31%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
20%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
36%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
31%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HCXLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GSKH55.600.40
+0.73%
GSK PLC ADRHEDGED GSKH
SMAY24.940.06
+0.26%
FT Vest US Sm Cp Mod Buffr ETF- May
NDVG34.95N/A
N/A
Nuveen Dividend Growth ETF
GVUS51.42-0.08
-0.16%
Goldman Sachs MktBt Russell LgCpValEqETF
PHO72.02-0.18
-0.25%
Invesco Water Resources ETF

GJNSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GJNSF and LMND have been poorly correlated (+2% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GJNSF and LMND's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GJNSF
1D Price
Change %
GJNSF100%
N/A
LMND - GJNSF
2%
Poorly correlated
-3.71%
AMIGF - GJNSF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HCXLF - GJNSF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GJNSY - GJNSF
-3%
Poorly correlated
-2.24%
AMIGY - GJNSF
-7%
Poorly correlated
-0.96%
More

HCXLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HCXLF and PLMR have been poorly correlated (+3% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HCXLF and PLMR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HCXLF
1D Price
Change %
HCXLF100%
N/A
PLMR - HCXLF
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.72%
GJNSF - HCXLF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AMIGF - HCXLF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AMIGY - HCXLF
-1%
Poorly correlated
-0.96%
GJNSY - HCXLF
-5%
Poorly correlated
-2.24%
More