Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GIRPX vs RNWBX
GIRPX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts GIRPX vs RNWBX
Goldman Sachs Em Mkts Eq Insghts I
Price$11.85
Change+$0.02 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.77B
American Funds New World R2
Price$92.29
Change-$0.25 (-0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.46B
GIRPX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GIRPX vs. RNWBX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GIRPX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. GIRPX (2.77B). GIRPX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: GIRPX (2.15) vs RNWBX (0.48). GIRPX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: GIRPX (15 years) vs RNWBX (24 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than GIRPX (1.26). GIRPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 168.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). GIRPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWBX: GIRPX (0) vs RNWBX (250). GIRPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 44.06 vs. RNWBX (27.43). RNWBX (8.49) and GIRPX (8.08) have equivalent 5 years return.
| GIRPX | RNWBX | GIRPX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.67 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 1.67 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.278 | 4.012 | 156% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.77B | 75.5B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.15 | 0.48 | 451% |
| Returns for 1 year | 44.06 | 27.43 | 161% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.86 | 38.02 | 152% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.08 | 8.49 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | 114.79 | 111.70 | 103% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers