Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GIRMX vs RNWHX
GIRMX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts GIRMX vs RNWHX
Goldman Sachs Emerging Markets Eq I
Price$33.36
Change+$3.56 (+11.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.13B
American Funds New World R5E
Price$97.53
Change+$2.43 (+2.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.46B
GIRMX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GIRMX vs. RNWHX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GIRMX is a Hold and RNWHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. GIRMX (3.13B). RNWHX pays higher dividends than GIRMX: RNWHX (1.25) vs GIRMX (0.66). GIRMX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: GIRMX (15 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). GIRMX (1.24) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. GIRMX (43.00). GIRMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWHX: GIRMX (0) vs RNWHX (250). GIRMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 46.90 vs. RNWHX (27.68). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 11.69 vs. GIRMX (5.92).
| GIRMX | RNWHX | GIRMX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.72 | 151% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 0.72 | 172% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.172 | 6.092 | 167% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.13B | 75.5B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.66 | 1.25 | 53% |
| Returns for 1 year | 46.90 | 27.68 | 169% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.57 | 43.24 | 126% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.92 | 11.69 | 51% |
| Returns for 10 years | 153.52 | 124.21 | 124% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers