Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GINNX vs RNPEX
GINNX vs RNPEX Comparison
Open Charts GINNX vs RNPEX
Guinness Atkinson™ Global Inntrs Instl
Price$58.32
Change-$9.10 (-13.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets190.21M
American Funds New Perspective R4
Price$70.27
Change-$2.55 (-3.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.72B
GINNX vs RNPEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GINNX vs. RNPEX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GINNX is a Hold and RNPEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPEX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. GINNX (190M). RNPEX pays higher dividends than GINNX: RNPEX (0.97) vs GINNX (0.00). GINNX was incepted earlier than RNPEX: GINNX (10 years) vs RNPEX (24 years). GINNX (1.10) is less costly to investors than RNPEX (0.75). GINNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.34 vs. RNPEX (23.00). RNPEX has a lower initial minimum investment than GINNX: RNPEX (250) vs GINNX (100000). RNPEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.84 vs. GINNX (-1.42). RNPEX return over 5 years is better than : 16.29 vs. GINNX (-8.30).
| GINNX | RNPEX | GINNX / RNPEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.75 | 132% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.75 | 147% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.102 | 1.605 | -69% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 190M | 163B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.97 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.42 | 12.84 | -11% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.77 | 41.11 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.30 | 16.29 | -51% |
| Returns for 10 years | 109.28 | 126.91 | 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers