Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GINNX vs NPFFX
GINNX vs NPFFX Comparison
Open Charts GINNX vs NPFFX
Guinness Atkinson™ Global Inntrs Instl
Price$58.32
Change-$9.10 (-13.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets190.21M
American Funds New Perspective F1
Price$71.11
Change-$2.53 (-3.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.72B
GINNX vs NPFFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GINNX vs. NPFFX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GINNX is a Hold and NPFFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFFX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. GINNX (190M). NPFFX pays higher dividends than GINNX: NPFFX (0.96) vs GINNX (0.00). GINNX was incepted earlier than NPFFX: GINNX (10 years) vs NPFFX (25 years). GINNX (1.10) is less costly to investors than NPFFX (0.77). GINNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.34 vs. NPFFX (23.00). NPFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GINNX: NPFFX (250) vs GINNX (100000). NPFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.88 vs. GINNX (-1.42). NPFFX return over 5 years is better than : 16.48 vs. GINNX (-8.30).
| GINNX | NPFFX | GINNX / NPFFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.77 | 129% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.77 | 143% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.102 | 1.600 | -69% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 190M | 163B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.96 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.42 | 12.88 | -11% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.77 | 41.24 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.30 | 16.48 | -50% |
| Returns for 10 years | 109.28 | 127.77 | 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers