Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GIMCX vs PACAX
GIMCX vs PACAX Comparison
Open Charts GIMCX vs PACAX
Nationwide Inv Dest Cnsrv R6
Price$10.01
Change+$0.02 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets257.22M
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Cnsrv A
Price$10.95
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets566.37M
GIMCX vs PACAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GIMCX vs. PACAX commentary
Aug 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GIMCX is a Buy and PACAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PACAX has more cash in the bank: 566M vs. GIMCX (257M). GIMCX (3.84) and PACAX (3.66) have matching dividends . GIMCX was incepted earlier than PACAX: GIMCX (21 years) vs PACAX (32 years). PACAX (1.00) is less costly to investors than GIMCX (0.53). PACAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 372.00 vs. GIMCX (28.74). PACAX has a lower initial minimum investment than GIMCX: PACAX (0) vs GIMCX (1000000). PACAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.46 vs. GIMCX (3.16). GIMCX return over 5 years is better than : 10.25 vs. PACAX (8.44).
| GIMCX | PACAX | GIMCX / PACAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.53 | 1.00 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.53 | 1.00 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.457 | 5.308 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 257M | 566M | 45% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.84 | 3.66 | 105% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.16 | 5.46 | 58% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.40 | 15.83 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.25 | 8.44 | 121% |
| Returns for 10 years | 27.64 | 22.49 | 123% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement