Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GIMCX vs PACAX
GIMCX vs PACAX Comparison
Open Charts GIMCX vs PACAX
Nationwide Inv Dest Cnsrv R6
Price$10.17
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets249.49M
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Cnsrv A
Price$11.24
Change+$0.01 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets604.53M
GIMCX vs PACAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GIMCX vs. PACAX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GIMCX is a Hold and PACAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PACAX has more cash in the bank: 605M vs. GIMCX (249M). PACAX (3.80) and GIMCX (3.76) have matching dividends . GIMCX was incepted earlier than PACAX: GIMCX (21 years) vs PACAX (32 years). PACAX (1.00) is less costly to investors than GIMCX (0.53). PACAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 243.00 vs. GIMCX (28.74). PACAX has a lower initial minimum investment than GIMCX: PACAX (0) vs GIMCX (1000000). PACAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.54 vs. GIMCX (6.37). PACAX return over 5 years is better than : 10.15 vs. GIMCX (8.28).
| GIMCX | PACAX | GIMCX / PACAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.53 | 1.00 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.53 | 1.00 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.700 | 9.253 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 249M | 605M | 41% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.76 | 3.80 | 99% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.37 | 8.54 | 75% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.03 | 30.84 | 62% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.28 | 10.15 | 82% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.36 | 36.44 | 92% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement